PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCNY vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCNY vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (XCNY) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCNY achieves a 14.37% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 9.37% return.


XCNY

1D
-4.45%
1M
-3.03%
YTD
14.37%
6M
17.01%
1Y
30.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPYG

1D
-3.83%
1M
0.23%
YTD
9.37%
6M
8.40%
1Y
29.53%
3Y*
26.56%
5Y*
15.17%
10Y*
17.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCNY vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XCNY
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
14.37%20.42%-3.51%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
9.37%22.09%12.91%

Correlation

The correlation between XCNY and SPYG is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024

0.66

The correlation between XCNY and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

XCNY vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XCNY
SPYG

Technology

36.1%
51.9%

Financial Services

21.7%
8.5%

Basic Materials

8.7%
0.3%

Industrials

7.7%
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
8.9%

Energy

4.9%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
1.0%

Communication Services

3.5%
16.8%

Utilities

3.3%
1.2%

Healthcare

2.7%
5.8%

Real Estate

2.3%
0.6%

Technology

XCNY
36.1%
SPYG
51.9%

Financial Services

XCNY
21.7%
SPYG
8.5%

Basic Materials

XCNY
8.7%
SPYG
0.3%

Industrials

XCNY
7.7%
SPYG
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XCNY
5.6%
SPYG
8.9%

Energy

XCNY
4.9%
SPYG
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

XCNY
3.6%
SPYG
1.0%

Communication Services

XCNY
3.5%
SPYG
16.8%

Utilities

XCNY
3.3%
SPYG
1.2%

Healthcare

XCNY
2.7%
SPYG
5.8%

Real Estate

XCNY
2.3%
SPYG
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCNY vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCNY
XCNY Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
XCNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCNY Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
XCNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCNY Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCNY vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (XCNY) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCNYSPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.32

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

2.16

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.94

8.88

+1.07

XCNY vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCNY Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCNY and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCNYSPYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

1.80

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.35

+0.64

Drawdowns

XCNY vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCNY drawdown since its inception was -19.70%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCNY and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCNYSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.70%

-67.63%

+47.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.86%

-13.76%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.49%

-4.93%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

-24.32%

+20.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

3.33%

-0.23%

Volatility

XCNY vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (XCNY) has a higher volatility of 7.62% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 5.63%. This indicates that XCNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCNYSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.62%

5.63%

+1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.21%

13.09%

+2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.22%

16.53%

+0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.04%

21.23%

-3.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.04%

20.68%

-2.64%

XCNY vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCNY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XCNY vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

XCNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than SPYG's 0.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.48%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%
XCNY
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
2.35%2.68%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCNY and SPYG have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XCNY has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to SPYG (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCNY dropped -19.70% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 1-year performance, XCNY leads with 30.73% vs 29.53% for SPYG. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 5.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XCNY has performed better with a 30.73% return vs 29.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XCNY.

XCNY has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.48% for SPYG.

XCNY is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while SPYG is S&P 500. XCNY tracks S&P Emerging ex-China BMI, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XCNY and 0.04% for SPYG.

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCNY and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer