XCLR vs. USO
XCLR (Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - XCLR is a Equity Hedged fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 3-Month Collar 95-110 Index, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCLR returned 13.42%/yr vs 29.98%/yr for USO. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCLR charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.
Performance
XCLR vs. USO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCLR achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 103.67% return.
XCLR
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 2.37%
- 6M
- 2.16%
- 1Y
- 13.37%
- 3Y*
- 13.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USO
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- -4.57%
- YTD
- 103.67%
- 6M
- 99.35%
- 1Y
- 101.55%
- 3Y*
- 29.98%
- 5Y*
- 24.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.07%
XCLR vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCLR Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF | 2.37% | 10.25% | 20.67% | 15.64% | -12.93% | 3.44% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 103.67% | -8.46% | 13.35% | -4.94% | 28.97% | 14.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCLR and USO is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021 | 0.08 |
The correlation between XCLR and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCLR vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank
XCLR
USO
XCLR vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCLR | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.38 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 5.01 | -3.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.51 | 9.42 | -2.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCLR | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 2.31 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | -0.18 | +0.91 |
Drawdowns
XCLR vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCLR drawdown since its inception was -14.63%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCLR and USO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCLR | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.63% | -98.19% | +83.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -20.39% | +12.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.46% | -26.05% | +13.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -85.01% | +84.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.71% | -75.30% | +70.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 10.82% | -8.76% |
Volatility
XCLR vs. USO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) is 0.61%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 14.87%. This indicates that XCLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCLR | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.61% | 14.87% | -14.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.18% | 38.23% | -32.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.58% | 44.20% | -35.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.44% | 36.06% | -25.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.44% | 39.00% | -28.56% |
XCLR vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCLR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCLR vs. USO - Dividend Comparison
XCLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.85%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XCLR Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF | 12.85% | 13.15% | 18.76% | 1.40% | 1.01% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCLR and USO have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USO has higher volatility (14.87%) compared to XCLR (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCLR dropped -14.63% vs USO's -98.19%.
On 3-year performance, USO leads with 29.98% vs 13.42% for XCLR. On fees, XCLR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, XCLR has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, USO has performed better with a 29.98% return vs 13.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XCLR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.
XCLR has the higher dividend yield at 12.85%, compared with 0.00% for USO.
XCLR is categorized as Equity Hedged, while USO is Oil & Gas. XCLR tracks Cboe S&P 500 3-Month Collar 95-110 Index, while USO tracks Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Global X and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XCLR and 0.86% for USO.
USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XCLR and USO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer