XCHG vs. UJUN
XCHG (AB US Equity ETF) and UJUN (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June) are both exchange-traded funds - XCHG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while UJUN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect June Series Index. XCHG is actively managed, while UJUN is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XCHG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for UJUN.
Performance
XCHG vs. UJUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCHG achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly higher than UJUN's 3.57% return.
XCHG
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 3.47%
- 6M
- 6.06%
- YTD
- 8.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UJUN
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- 8.47%
- 3Y*
- 10.63%
- 5Y*
- 6.17%
- 10Y*
- —
XCHG vs. UJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XCHG AB US Equity ETF | 8.47% | 0.38% |
UJUN Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June | 3.57% | 0.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCHG and UJUN is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCHG vs. UJUN — Risk / Return Rank
XCHG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UJUN
XCHG vs. UJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US Equity ETF (XCHG) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June (UJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XCHG | UJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.37 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XCHG vs. UJUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCHG drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, smaller than the maximum UJUN drawdown of -13.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCHG and UJUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCHG | UJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.66% | -13.73% | +4.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.05% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.84% | -2.05% | +0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.58% | — |
Volatility
XCHG vs. UJUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCHG | UJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.02% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.16% | 4.61% | +8.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.16% | 8.38% | +4.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.16% | 8.75% | +4.41% |
XCHG vs. UJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCHG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than UJUN's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCHG vs. UJUN - Dividend Comparison
XCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, while UJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UJUN Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.89% |
XCHG AB US Equity ETF | 0.37% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCHG and UJUN have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCHG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCHG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UJUN.
XCHG has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for UJUN.
XCHG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while UJUN is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XCHG and 0.79% for UJUN.
Find the right allocation for XCHG and UJUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer