XCHG vs. FJUN

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

XCHG (AB US Equity ETF) and FJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June) are both exchange-traded funds - XCHG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while FJUN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index June. XCHG is actively managed, while FJUN is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XCHG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FJUN.

Performance

XCHG vs. FJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB US Equity ETF (XCHG) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCHG achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly higher than FJUN's 5.82% return.

XCHG

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 3.47%
• 6M: 6.06%
• YTD: 8.47%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FJUN

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 1.05%
• 6M: 5.05%
• YTD: 5.82%
• 1Y: 12.07%
• 3Y*: 13.40%
• 5Y*: 10.67%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCHG vs. FJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XCHG AB US Equity ETF	8.47%	0.38%
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June	5.82%	0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between XCHG and FJUN is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025	0.85

Return for Risk

XCHG vs. FJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCHG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FJUN

FJUN Risk / Return Rank: 84
FJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCHG vs. FJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US Equity ETF (XCHG) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XCHG	FJUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.05	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.16	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.43	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.86	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	16.17	—

Drawdowns

XCHG vs. FJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCHG drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, smaller than the maximum FJUN drawdown of -13.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCHG and FJUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	XCHG	FJUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.66%	-13.26%	+3.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.13%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.26%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.84%	-1.65%	-0.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.73%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XCHG	FJUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.86%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.64%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.16%	5.76%	+7.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.16%	10.56%	+2.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.16%	10.23%	+2.93%

XCHG vs. FJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCHG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FJUN's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

XCHG vs. FJUN - Dividend Comparison

XCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, while FJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%
XCHG AB US Equity ETF	0.37%	0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XCHG and FJUN in my portfolio?

XCHG and FJUN have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XCHG or FJUN?

On fees, XCHG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XCHG or FJUN?

XCHG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FJUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XCHG or FJUN?

XCHG has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for FJUN.

What is the main difference between XCHG and FJUN?

XCHG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FJUN is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XCHG and 0.85% for FJUN.