PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJUN vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJUN vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJUN achieves a 3.90% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 10.35% return.


DJUN

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.35%
YTD
3.90%
6M
3.92%
1Y
11.14%
3Y*
11.36%
5Y*
8.02%
10Y*

VTI

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.55%
YTD
10.35%
6M
9.59%
1Y
27.18%
3Y*
21.19%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
15.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJUN vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DJUN
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June
3.90%9.38%13.92%17.58%-6.30%6.27%6.78%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
10.35%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%25.49%

Correlation

The correlation between DJUN and VTI is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2020

0.91

The correlation between DJUN and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJUN vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJUN
DJUN Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJUN vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DJUNVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.38

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

3.06

+0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.05

13.68

+8.37

DJUN vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJUN Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJUN and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DJUN vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJUN drawdown since its inception was -11.96%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJUN and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJUNVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.96%

-55.45%

+43.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.15%

-8.92%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.96%

-19.30%

+7.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.96%

-25.36%

+13.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-1.48%

+1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.58%

-8.01%

+6.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.51%

1.99%

-1.48%

Volatility

DJUN vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN) is 0.28%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 4.74%. This indicates that DJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJUNVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.28%

4.74%

-4.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.54%

9.96%

-6.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.47%

12.76%

-8.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.51%

17.49%

-8.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.02%

18.35%

-10.33%

DJUN vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJUN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

DJUN vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

DJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DJUN
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.02%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


DJUN and VTI have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTI has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to DJUN (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJUN dropped -11.96% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 5-year performance, VTI leads with 12.36% vs 8.02% for DJUN. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VTI has performed better with a 12.36% return vs 8.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DJUN.

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.00% for DJUN.

DJUN tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect June Series Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DJUN and 0.03% for VTI.

DJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJUN and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer