XCHG vs. BLCR
XCHG (AB US Equity ETF) and BLCR (Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XCHG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for BLCR.
Performance
XCHG vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCHG achieves a 5.48% return, which is significantly lower than BLCR's 15.03% return.
XCHG
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- -1.02%
- YTD
- 5.48%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLCR
- 1D
- -3.24%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- YTD
- 15.03%
- 6M
- 16.41%
- 1Y
- 41.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XCHG vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XCHG AB US Equity ETF | 5.48% | 0.30% |
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF | 15.03% | 2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCHG and BLCR is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCHG vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank
XCHG
BLCR
XCHG vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US Equity ETF (XCHG) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCHG | BLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 1.77 | -0.81 |
Drawdowns
XCHG vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCHG drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, smaller than the maximum BLCR drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCHG and BLCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCHG | BLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.66% | -21.29% | +11.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -4.15% | +2.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.87% | -2.19% | +0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.18% | — |
Volatility
XCHG vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCHG | BLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.44% | 15.90% | -2.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.44% | 17.57% | -4.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.44% | 17.57% | -4.13% |
XCHG vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCHG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCHG vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison
XCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than BLCR's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.75% | 0.13% |
XCHG AB US Equity ETF | 0.22% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCHG and BLCR have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BLCR is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLCR is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCHG.
BLCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.22% for XCHG.
They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XCHG and 0.36% for BLCR.
Find the right allocation for XCHG and BLCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer