XCHA.DE vs. ^IXIC
XCHA.DE (Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C) is China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, while ^IXIC (NASDAQ Composite) is an index. Over the past 10 years, XCHA.DE returned 9.08%/yr vs 18.11%/yr for ^IXIC. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XCHA.DE vs. ^IXIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XCHA.DE is traded in EUR, while ^IXIC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^IXIC values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCHA.DE achieves a 12.47% return, which is significantly lower than ^IXIC's 16.76% return. Over the past 10 years, XCHA.DE has underperformed ^IXIC with an annualized return of 9.08%, while ^IXIC has yielded a comparatively higher 18.11% annualized return.
XCHA.DE
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 3.17%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 6M
- 15.67%
- 1Y
- 39.28%
- 3Y*
- 12.45%
- 5Y*
- 3.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
^IXIC
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 6.65%
- YTD
- 16.76%
- 6M
- 14.46%
- 1Y
- 35.56%
- 3Y*
- 23.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.26%
- 10Y*
- 18.11%
XCHA.DE vs. ^IXIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCHA.DE Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 12.47% | 14.69% | 24.35% | -14.26% | -19.18% | 13.33% | 31.24% | 44.98% | -21.84% | 18.89% |
^IXIC NASDAQ Composite | 16.76% | 6.07% | 37.13% | 39.12% | -28.95% | 30.47% | 31.80% | 38.28% | 0.63% | 12.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCHA.DE and ^IXIC is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2012 | 0.29 |
The correlation between XCHA.DE and ^IXIC shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (3 years) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCHA.DE vs. ^IXIC — Risk / Return Rank
XCHA.DE
^IXIC
XCHA.DE vs. ^IXIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE) and NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCHA.DE | ^IXIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.38 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 2.90 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.62 | 9.42 | -4.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCHA.DE | ^IXIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 2.17 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.70 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.81 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.64 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
XCHA.DE vs. ^IXIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCHA.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.27%, which is greater than ^IXIC's maximum drawdown of -49.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCHA.DE and ^IXIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCHA.DE | ^IXIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.27% | -49.37% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.43% | -12.32% | -4.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.32% | -28.54% | +2.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.07% | -32.41% | -4.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.55% | -32.41% | -6.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.81% | -0.83% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.73% | -8.78% | -13.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.48% | 3.78% | +4.70% |
Volatility
XCHA.DE vs. ^IXIC - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) at 3.52%. This indicates that XCHA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^IXIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCHA.DE | ^IXIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | 3.52% | +1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.37% | 11.50% | -1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.51% | 16.45% | +10.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.27% | 22.06% | +1.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.20% | 22.31% | +0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCHA.DE and ^IXIC have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for XCHA.DE and ^IXIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer