PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCCC vs. LDRH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XCCC vs. LDRH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XCCC vs. LDRH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCCC achieves a -2.95% return, which is significantly lower than LDRH's 0.51% return.


XCCC

1D
1.20%
1M
-1.66%
YTD
-2.95%
6M
-2.98%
1Y
6.05%
3Y*
10.34%
5Y*
10Y*

LDRH

1D
0.65%
1M
0.04%
YTD
0.51%
6M
1.75%
1Y
6.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XCCC vs. LDRH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCCC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than LDRH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XCCC vs. LDRH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCCC
XCCC Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
XCCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCCC Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
XCCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCCC Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

LDRH
LDRH Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
LDRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDRH Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
LDRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDRH Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCCC vs. LDRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCCCLDRHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.63

1.70

-1.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.90

2.61

-1.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.40

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

2.32

-1.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.09

14.23

-11.14

XCCC vs. LDRH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCCC Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the LDRH Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCCC and LDRH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCCCLDRHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

1.70

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

1.58

-0.69

Correlation

The correlation between XCCC and LDRH is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XCCC vs. LDRH - Dividend Comparison

XCCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.23%, more than LDRH's 6.99% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
XCCC
BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
10.23%10.06%10.68%12.05%7.63%
LDRH
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF
6.99%6.41%1.13%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XCCC vs. LDRH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCCC drawdown since its inception was -10.99%, which is greater than LDRH's maximum drawdown of -3.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCCC and LDRH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XCCCLDRHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.99%

-3.17%

-7.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.25%

-2.82%

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.93%

-0.46%

-3.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.95%

-0.25%

-1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

0.46%

+1.41%

Volatility

XCCC vs. LDRH - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH) at 1.41%. This indicates that XCCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XCCCLDRHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

1.41%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.10%

2.03%

+2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.63%

3.89%

+5.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.95%

3.62%

+5.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.95%

3.62%

+5.33%