XCCC vs. IBHG
XCCC (BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and IBHG (iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - XCCC tracks the ICE BofA CCC and Lower US High Yield Constrained Index while IBHG tracks the Bloomberg 2027 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCCC returned 10.79%/yr vs 7.37%/yr for IBHG. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XCCC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IBHG.
Performance
XCCC vs. IBHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCCC achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than IBHG's 0.96% return.
XCCC
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- YTD
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 5.67%
- 3Y*
- 10.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBHG
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 1.46%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 7.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XCCC vs. IBHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCCC BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | -0.05% | 7.25% | 13.01% | 20.57% | -5.33% |
IBHG iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 0.96% | 6.90% | 7.42% | 11.27% | -2.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCCC and IBHG is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2022 | 0.79 |
The correlation between XCCC and IBHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCCC vs. IBHG — Risk / Return Rank
XCCC
IBHG
XCCC vs. IBHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) and iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCCC | IBHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.42 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 6.38 | -5.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.72 | 23.30 | -19.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCCC | IBHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 2.20 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.56 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
XCCC vs. IBHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCCC drawdown since its inception was -10.99%, smaller than the maximum IBHG drawdown of -13.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCCC and IBHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCCC | IBHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.99% | -13.85% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.11% | -0.73% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.99% | -3.39% | -7.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -0.22% | -0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.93% | -2.67% | +0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 0.20% | +1.33% |
Volatility
XCCC vs. IBHG - Volatility Comparison
BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) has a higher volatility of 1.51% compared to iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG) at 0.58%. This indicates that XCCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCCC | IBHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.51% | 0.58% | +0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.02% | 1.53% | +2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.25% | 2.11% | +3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.82% | 6.37% | +2.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.82% | 6.37% | +2.45% |
XCCC vs. IBHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCCC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IBHG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCCC vs. IBHG - Dividend Comparison
XCCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.05%, more than IBHG's 6.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBHG iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 6.08% | 6.33% | 7.02% | 6.66% | 5.62% | 2.13% |
XCCC BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 10.05% | 10.06% | 10.68% | 12.05% | 7.63% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCCC and IBHG have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XCCC has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to IBHG (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCCC dropped -10.99% vs IBHG's -13.85%.
On 3-year performance, XCCC leads with 10.79% vs 7.37% for IBHG. On fees, IBHG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IBHG has been the lower-risk option at 0.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XCCC has performed better with a 10.79% return vs 7.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBHG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for XCCC.
XCCC has the higher dividend yield at 10.05%, compared with 6.08% for IBHG.
XCCC tracks ICE BofA CCC and Lower US High Yield Constrained Index, while IBHG tracks Bloomberg 2027 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for XCCC and 0.35% for IBHG.
IBHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XCCC and IBHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer