XCCC vs. HYHG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XCCC (BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and HYHG (ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged) are both High Yield Bonds funds - XCCC tracks the ICE BofA CCC and Lower US High Yield Constrained Index while HYHG tracks the Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCCC returned 10.79%/yr vs 9.69%/yr for HYHG. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XCCC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HYHG.

Performance

XCCC vs. HYHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) and ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCCC achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than HYHG's 2.90% return.

XCCC

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -0.23%
• YTD: -0.05%
• 6M: 0.38%
• 1Y: 5.67%
• 3Y*: 10.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HYHG

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 2.90%
• 6M: 3.60%
• 1Y: 7.32%
• 3Y*: 9.69%
• 5Y*: 6.96%
• 10Y*: 6.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCCC vs. HYHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XCCC BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	-0.05%	7.25%	13.01%	20.57%	-5.33%
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged	2.90%	5.31%	11.41%	14.69%	0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between XCCC and HYHG is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2022	0.54

The correlation between XCCC and HYHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XCCC vs. HYHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XCCC	HYHG
Communication Services	12.8%	1.1%
Energy	3.9%	-
Industrials	3.7%	-
Real Estate	3.7%	-
Basic Materials	3.2%	-
Healthcare	3.2%	0.6%
Technology	2.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.9%	-
Financial Services	0.7%	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XCCC vs. HYHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCCC

XCCC Risk / Return Rank: 27
XCCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
XCCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
XCCC Omega Ratio Rank: 28
XCCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
XCCC Martin Ratio Rank: 27

HYHG

HYHG Risk / Return Rank: 49
HYHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
HYHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
HYHG Omega Ratio Rank: 35
HYHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
HYHG Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCCC vs. HYHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) and ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XCCC	HYHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	1.32	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	1.93	-0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.24	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	3.64	-2.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.72	11.96	-8.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XCCC vs. HYHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCCC Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the HYHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCCC and HYHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XCCC	HYHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.09	1.32	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.96	0.46	+0.50

Drawdowns

XCCC vs. HYHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCCC drawdown since its inception was -10.99%, smaller than the maximum HYHG drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCCC and HYHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	XCCC	HYHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.99%	-25.71%	+14.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.11%	-2.02%	-3.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.99%	-7.47%	-3.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-9.21%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-25.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.05%	-0.45%	-0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.93%	-3.04%	+1.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.53%	0.61%	+0.92%

Volatility

XCCC vs. HYHG - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) and ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG) have volatilities of 1.51% and 1.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XCCC	HYHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.51%	1.45%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.02%	4.33%	-0.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.25%	5.56%	-0.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.82%	8.16%	+0.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.82%	9.15%	-0.33%

XCCC vs. HYHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCCC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HYHG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

XCCC vs. HYHG - Dividend Comparison

XCCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.05%, more than HYHG's 6.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged	6.79%	6.97%	6.57%	6.07%	5.58%	4.54%	5.21%	6.06%	6.45%	5.57%	5.37%	6.37%
XCCC BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	10.05%	10.06%	10.68%	12.05%	7.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XCCC and HYHG in my portfolio?

XCCC and HYHG have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XCCC or HYHG?

XCCC has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to HYHG (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCCC dropped -10.99% vs HYHG's -25.71%.

Which ETF is better, XCCC or HYHG?

On 3-year performance, XCCC leads with 10.79% vs 9.69% for HYHG. On fees, XCCC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XCCC or HYHG?

Over the 3-year period, XCCC has performed better with a 10.79% return vs 9.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XCCC or HYHG?

XCCC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HYHG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XCCC or HYHG?

XCCC has the higher dividend yield at 10.05%, compared with 6.79% for HYHG.

What is the main difference between XCCC and HYHG?

XCCC tracks ICE BofA CCC and Lower US High Yield Constrained Index, while HYHG tracks Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for XCCC and 0.50% for HYHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HYHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.