XCCC vs. ESHY
XCCC (BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and ESHY (Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - XCCC tracks the ICE BofA CCC and Lower US High Yield Constrained Index while ESHY tracks the JPMorgan ESG DM Corporate High Yield USD Index. Both are passively managed. XCCC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ESHY.
Performance
XCCC vs. ESHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XCCC
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- YTD
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 5.67%
- 3Y*
- 10.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESHY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XCCC vs. ESHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XCCC BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.42% |
ESHY Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.00% |
XCCC vs. ESHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XCCC
ESHY
Communication Services
-
Energy
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
XCCC
ESHY
-
Energy
XCCC
ESHY
Industrials
XCCC
ESHY
-
Real Estate
XCCC
ESHY
-
Basic Materials
XCCC
ESHY
-
Healthcare
XCCC
ESHY
-
Technology
XCCC
ESHY
-
Consumer Cyclical
XCCC
ESHY
-
Consumer Defensive
XCCC
ESHY
-
Financial Services
XCCC
ESHY
-
Utilities
XCCC
-
ESHY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCCC vs. ESHY — Risk / Return Rank
XCCC
ESHY
XCCC vs. ESHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) and Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (ESHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCCC | ESHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.72 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCCC | ESHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | — | — |
Drawdowns
XCCC vs. ESHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCCC drawdown since its inception was -10.99%, which is greater than ESHY's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCCC and ESHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCCC | ESHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.99% | 0.00% | -10.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | 0.00% | -1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.93% | 0.00% | -1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | — | — |
Volatility
XCCC vs. ESHY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCCC | ESHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.51% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.02% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.25% | 0.00% | +5.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.82% | 0.00% | +8.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.82% | 0.00% | +8.82% |
XCCC vs. ESHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCCC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ESHY's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCCC vs. ESHY - Dividend Comparison
XCCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.05%, while ESHY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESHY Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XCCC BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 10.05% | 10.06% | 10.68% | 12.05% | 7.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, ESHY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESHY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for XCCC.
XCCC has the higher dividend yield at 10.05%, compared with 0.00% for ESHY.
XCCC tracks ICE BofA CCC and Lower US High Yield Constrained Index, while ESHY tracks JPMorgan ESG DM Corporate High Yield USD Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for XCCC and 0.20% for ESHY.
Find the right allocation for XCCC and ESHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer