XCCC vs. DADS
XCCC (BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and DADS (Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. XCCC is passively managed, while DADS is actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XCCC charges 0.40%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for DADS.
Performance
XCCC vs. DADS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCCC achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than DADS's 14.37% return.
XCCC
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- YTD
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 5.67%
- 3Y*
- 10.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DADS
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 14.37%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XCCC vs. DADS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XCCC BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | -0.05% | 2.66% |
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 14.37% | -3.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCCC and DADS is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2025 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCCC vs. DADS — Risk / Return Rank
XCCC
DADS
XCCC vs. DADS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) and Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF (DADS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCCC | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.72 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCCC | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.73 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
XCCC vs. DADS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCCC drawdown since its inception was -10.99%, smaller than the maximum DADS drawdown of -17.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCCC and DADS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCCC | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.99% | -17.07% | +6.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -2.77% | +1.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.93% | -7.63% | +5.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | — | — |
Volatility
XCCC vs. DADS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCCC | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.51% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.02% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.25% | 17.58% | -12.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.82% | 17.58% | -8.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.82% | 17.58% | -8.76% |
XCCC vs. DADS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCCC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DADS's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCCC vs. DADS - Dividend Comparison
XCCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.05%, more than DADS's 2.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 2.76% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XCCC BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 10.05% | 10.06% | 10.68% | 12.05% | 7.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCCC and DADS have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCCC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCCC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for DADS.
XCCC has the higher dividend yield at 10.05%, compared with 2.76% for DADS.
They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Alphabit. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for XCCC and 1.04% for DADS.
Find the right allocation for XCCC and DADS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer