PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XC vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XC vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XC achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly lower than DGRW's 8.57% return.


XC

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.18%
6M
-3.23%
YTD
0.10%
1Y
7.41%
3Y*
9.35%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.81%

DGRW

1D
0.49%
1M
0.69%
6M
6.01%
YTD
8.57%
1Y
16.02%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
11.41%
10Y*
13.71%
ALL TIME*
12.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$51.03M$48.50M$56.54M
$811.45K$489.30K$569.06K

XC vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XC
WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
0.10%18.19%5.49%21.31%1.58%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
8.57%12.17%16.98%18.66%7.37%

Correlation

The correlation between XC and DGRW is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2022

0.65

The correlation between XC and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

XC vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XC
DGRW

Financial Services

31.9%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

12.1%
8.0%

Industrials

10.9%
11.8%

Basic Materials

10.0%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

8.0%
6.7%

Communication Services

6.3%
11.1%

Healthcare

4.9%
12.8%

Energy

4.5%
4.5%

Real Estate

4.0%

-

Utilities

3.8%
0.2%

Technology

3.5%
33.8%

Financial Services

XC
31.9%
DGRW
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XC
12.1%
DGRW
8.0%

Industrials

XC
10.9%
DGRW
11.8%

Basic Materials

XC
10.0%
DGRW
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

XC
8.0%
DGRW
6.7%

Communication Services

XC
6.3%
DGRW
11.1%

Healthcare

XC
4.9%
DGRW
12.8%

Energy

XC
4.5%
DGRW
4.5%

Real Estate

XC
4.0%
DGRW

-

Utilities

XC
3.8%
DGRW
0.2%

Technology

XC
3.5%
DGRW
33.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XC vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XC
XC Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
XC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
XC Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
XC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XC Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XC vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XCDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.26

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

1.79

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.48

7.25

-5.77

XC vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XC Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XC and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XC vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XC drawdown since its inception was -20.97%, smaller than the maximum DGRW drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XC and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.97%

-32.04%

+11.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.47%

-8.30%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.97%

-16.21%

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.00%

-1.31%

-4.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.25%

-3.00%

-1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.14%

2.05%

+3.09%

Volatility

XC vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 2.92%. This indicates that XC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

2.92%

+1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.39%

8.33%

+5.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.98%

10.44%

+4.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.83%

14.01%

+1.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.83%

16.18%

-0.35%

XC vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

XC has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

XC vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

XC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.01%, more than DGRW's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.28%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
XC
WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
12.01%11.74%1.49%1.42%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XC and DGRW have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XC has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to DGRW (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XC dropped -20.97% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 3-year performance, DGRW leads with 13.97% vs 9.35% for XC. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 13.97% return vs 9.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for XC.

XC has the higher dividend yield at 12.01%, compared with 1.28% for DGRW.

XC is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DGRW is Quality Factor. XC tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Index - Benchmark TR Net, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for XC and 0.28% for DGRW.

DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XC and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer