PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
XC vs. XCEM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between XC and XCEM is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

XC vs. XCEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) and Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-2.59%
-4.43%
XC
XCEM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

XC:

0.60

XCEM:

0.24

Sortino Ratio

XC:

0.92

XCEM:

0.42

Omega Ratio

XC:

1.12

XCEM:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

XC:

0.80

XCEM:

0.33

Martin Ratio

XC:

2.24

XCEM:

0.93

Ulcer Index

XC:

4.09%

XCEM:

3.73%

Daily Std Dev

XC:

15.22%

XCEM:

14.25%

Max Drawdown

XC:

-12.29%

XCEM:

-40.92%

Current Drawdown

XC:

-9.13%

XCEM:

-9.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XC achieves a 5.96% return, which is significantly higher than XCEM's 0.69% return.


XC

YTD

5.96%

1M

-1.10%

6M

-2.66%

1Y

8.44%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

XCEM

YTD

0.69%

1M

-1.97%

6M

-4.14%

1Y

2.90%

5Y*

3.29%

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XC vs. XCEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XC has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than XCEM's 0.16% expense ratio.


XC
WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
Expense ratio chart for XC: current value at 0.32% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.32%
Expense ratio chart for XCEM: current value at 0.16% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.16%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XC vs. XCEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) and Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XC, currently valued at 0.60, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.600.24
The chart of Sortino ratio for XC, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.000.920.42
The chart of Omega ratio for XC, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.121.05
The chart of Calmar ratio for XC, currently valued at 0.80, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.800.35
The chart of Martin ratio for XC, currently valued at 2.24, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.240.93
XC
XCEM

The current XC Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is higher than the XCEM Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XC and XCEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.60
0.24
XC
XCEM

Dividends

XC vs. XCEM - Dividend Comparison

XC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than XCEM's 2.75% yield.


TTM202320222021202020192018201720162015
XC
WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
1.29%1.42%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XCEM
Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF
2.75%1.22%2.42%1.94%1.63%2.11%3.24%8.57%1.24%2.57%

Drawdowns

XC vs. XCEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XC drawdown since its inception was -12.29%, smaller than the maximum XCEM drawdown of -40.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XC and XCEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-9.13%
-9.80%
XC
XCEM

Volatility

XC vs. XCEM - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) at 3.46%. This indicates that XC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
3.81%
3.46%
XC
XCEM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab