XC vs. EMXC

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

XC (WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund) and EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - XC tracks the WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Index - Benchmark TR Net while EMXC tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XC returned 9.35%/yr vs 22.73%/yr for EMXC. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. XC charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EMXC.

Performance

XC vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XC achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 27.50% return.

XC

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 1.18%
• 6M: -3.23%
• YTD: 0.10%
• 1Y: 7.41%
• 3Y*: 9.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.81%

EMXC

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: -5.01%
• 6M: 16.09%
• YTD: 27.50%
• 1Y: 50.99%
• 3Y*: 22.73%
• 5Y*: 11.22%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	$245.04M	$277.03M	$277.07M
XC WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund	$811.45K	$489.30K	$569.06K

XC vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XC WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund	0.10%	18.19%	5.49%	21.31%	1.58%
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	27.50%	35.14%	2.68%	18.96%	2.04%

Correlation

The correlation between XC and EMXC is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2022	0.88

The correlation between XC and EMXC shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XC vs. EMXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XC	EMXC
Financial Services	31.9%	18.0%
Consumer Cyclical	12.1%	3.8%
Industrials	10.9%	6.5%
Basic Materials	10.0%	5.5%
Consumer Defensive	8.0%	2.4%
Communication Services	6.3%	2.9%
Healthcare	4.9%	1.8%
Energy	4.5%	3.1%
Real Estate	4.0%	0.8%
Utilities	3.8%	1.8%
Technology	3.5%	53.4%

Return for Risk

XC vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XC

XC Risk / Return Rank: 22
XC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
XC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
XC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
XC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
XC Martin Ratio Rank: 21

EMXC

EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 78
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 81
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XC vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XC	EMXC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.51	1.83	-1.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.83	2.35	-1.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.34	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.61	2.74	-2.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.48	9.76	-8.29

XC vs. EMXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XC Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the EMXC Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XC and EMXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XC vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XC drawdown since its inception was -20.97%, smaller than the maximum EMXC drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XC and EMXC.

Drawdown Indicators

	XC	EMXC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.97%	-42.81%	+21.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.47%	-18.43%	+5.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.97%	-19.12%	-1.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.00%	-13.49%	+7.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.25%	-10.15%	+5.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.14%	5.17%	-0.03%

Volatility

XC vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) is 4.16%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 10.83%. This indicates that XC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XC	EMXC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.16%	10.83%	-6.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.39%	25.90%	-12.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.98%	27.60%	-12.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.83%	19.04%	-3.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.83%	20.50%	-4.67%

XC vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XC has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

XC vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

XC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.01%, more than EMXC's 2.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	2.09%	2.82%	2.69%	1.83%	2.85%	1.78%	1.45%	3.25%	2.63%	0.99%
XC WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund	12.01%	11.74%	1.49%	1.42%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XC and EMXC in my portfolio?

XC and EMXC have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XC or EMXC?

EMXC has higher volatility (10.83%) compared to XC (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XC dropped -20.97% vs EMXC's -42.81%.

Which ETF is better, XC or EMXC?

On 3-year performance, EMXC leads with 22.73% vs 9.35% for XC. On fees, XC is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, XC has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XC or EMXC?

Over the 3-year period, EMXC has performed better with a 22.73% return vs 9.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XC or EMXC?

XC is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMXC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XC or EMXC?

XC has the higher dividend yield at 12.01%, compared with 2.09% for EMXC.

What is the main difference between XC and EMXC?

XC tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Index - Benchmark TR Net, while EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for XC and 0.49% for EMXC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.