XBCI vs. EZET
XBCI (NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF) and EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. XBCI is actively managed, while EZET is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XBCI charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZET.
Performance
XBCI vs. EZET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XBCI
- 1D
- -4.22%
- 1M
- -28.48%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZET
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -25.14%
- YTD
- -40.23%
- 6M
- -43.56%
- 1Y
- -32.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBCI vs. EZET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF | -19.85% |
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF | -22.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBCI and EZET is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBCI vs. EZET — Risk / Return Rank
XBCI
EZET
XBCI vs. EZET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBCI | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.73 | -0.42 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
XBCI vs. EZET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBCI drawdown since its inception was -29.12%, smaller than the maximum EZET drawdown of -64.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBCI and EZET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBCI | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.12% | -64.05% | +34.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -63.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.12% | -63.36% | +34.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.31% | -32.74% | +24.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 37.94% | — |
Volatility
XBCI vs. EZET - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBCI | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.68% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 45.32% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.05% | 68.34% | -1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.05% | 72.29% | -5.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.05% | 72.29% | -5.24% |
XBCI vs. EZET - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBCI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than EZET's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBCI vs. EZET - Dividend Comparison
XBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.42%, while EZET has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF | 0.00% |
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF | 21.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, XBCI and EZET move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XBCI.
XBCI has the higher dividend yield at 21.42%, compared with 0.00% for EZET.
They also come from different issuers: Neos and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XBCI and 0.19% for EZET.
Find the right allocation for XBCI and EZET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer