XBCI vs. ECAT
XBCI (NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF) and ECAT (BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust) are both funds - XBCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos, while ECAT is a Derivative Income fund managed by BlackRock. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XBCI charges 0.98%/yr vs 1.38%/yr for ECAT.
Performance
XBCI vs. ECAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XBCI
- 1D
- -3.98%
- 1M
- -23.50%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ECAT
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 6.84%
- YTD
- 11.23%
- 6M
- 9.37%
- 1Y
- 20.83%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBCI vs. ECAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF | -16.32% |
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust | 9.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBCI and ECAT is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBCI vs. ECAT — Risk / Return Rank
XBCI
ECAT
XBCI vs. ECAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBCI | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.63 | 0.55 | -1.17 |
Drawdowns
XBCI vs. ECAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBCI drawdown since its inception was -25.99%, smaller than the maximum ECAT drawdown of -32.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBCI and ECAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBCI | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.99% | -32.23% | +6.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.99% | -1.20% | -24.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.06% | -9.11% | +1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.14% | — |
Volatility
XBCI vs. ECAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBCI | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.59% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.08% | 13.44% | +53.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.08% | 16.90% | +50.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.08% | 16.90% | +50.18% |
XBCI vs. ECAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBCI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than ECAT's 1.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBCI vs. ECAT - Dividend Comparison
XBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.51%, less than ECAT's 21.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust | 21.71% | 23.00% | 17.44% | 9.14% | 8.94% | 0.54% |
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF | 20.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBCI and ECAT have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for XBCI and ECAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer