XBB vs. PHYD
XBB (BondBloxx BB Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and PHYD (Putnam ESG High Yield ETF -) are both High Yield Bonds funds. XBB is passively managed, while PHYD is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XBB returned 8.13%/yr vs 8.72%/yr for PHYD. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XBB charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PHYD.
Performance
XBB vs. PHYD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XBB achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly lower than PHYD's 2.32% return.
XBB
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- 5.63%
- 3Y*
- 8.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PHYD
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 6M
- 2.40%
- 1Y
- 6.94%
- 3Y*
- 8.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBB vs. PHYD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XBB BondBloxx BB Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.75% | 8.59% | 6.41% | 7.37% |
PHYD Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - | 2.32% | 8.84% | 7.35% | 8.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBB and PHYD is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2023 | 0.75 |
The correlation between XBB and PHYD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBB vs. PHYD — Risk / Return Rank
XBB
PHYD
XBB vs. PHYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx BB Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XBB) and Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XBB | PHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.46 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 3.66 | -1.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.36 | 14.79 | -6.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XBB vs. PHYD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBB drawdown since its inception was -8.87%, which is greater than PHYD's maximum drawdown of -4.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBB and PHYD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBB | PHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.87% | -4.33% | -4.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.80% | -2.10% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.86% | -4.14% | +0.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.79% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.32% | -0.62% | -0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.68% | 0.52% | +0.16% |
Volatility
XBB vs. PHYD - Volatility Comparison
BondBloxx BB Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XBB) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD) at 1.07%. This indicates that XBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBB | PHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | 1.07% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.88% | 2.57% | +0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.97% | 3.36% | +0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.08% | 4.58% | +2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.08% | 4.58% | +2.50% |
XBB vs. PHYD - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PHYD's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBB vs. PHYD - Dividend Comparison
XBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%, less than PHYD's 8.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHYD Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - | 8.52% | 6.63% | 6.80% | 6.15% | 0.00% |
XBB BondBloxx BB Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.54% | 5.42% | 6.35% | 6.15% | 3.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBB and PHYD have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XBB has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to PHYD (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBB dropped -8.87% vs PHYD's -4.33%.
On 3-year performance, PHYD leads with 8.72% vs 8.13% for XBB. On fees, XBB is cheaper at 0.20% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PHYD has performed better with a 8.72% return vs 8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XBB is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PHYD.
PHYD has the higher dividend yield at 8.52%, compared with 5.54% for XBB.
They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XBB and 0.55% for PHYD.
PHYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XBB and PHYD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer