XB4A.DE vs. LBNK.DE
XB4A.DE (Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc)) and LBNK.DE (Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XB4A.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the ATX Index, while LBNK.DE is a Financials Equities fund tracking the STOXX Europe 600 Banks Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XB4A.DE returned 14.87%/yr vs 16.95%/yr for LBNK.DE. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XB4A.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LBNK.DE.
Performance
XB4A.DE vs. LBNK.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XB4A.DE achieves a 26.95% return, which is significantly higher than LBNK.DE's 24.69% return. Over the past 10 years, XB4A.DE has underperformed LBNK.DE with an annualized return of 14.87%, while LBNK.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 16.95% annualized return.
XB4A.DE
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 19.18%
- YTD
- 26.95%
- 1Y
- 51.55%
- 3Y*
- 31.73%
- 5Y*
- 17.66%
- 10Y*
- 14.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.70%
LBNK.DE
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- 6M
- 16.13%
- YTD
- 24.69%
- 1Y
- 57.18%
- 3Y*
- 45.69%
- 5Y*
- 32.62%
- 10Y*
- 16.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| €856.26K | €938.41K | €687.09K | |
| €328.27K | €331.20K | €348.45K |
XB4A.DE vs. LBNK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XB4A.DE Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) | 26.95% | 51.29% | 11.01% | 14.27% | -16.45% | 42.39% | -10.86% | 19.79% | -17.99% | 32.88% |
LBNK.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc | 24.69% | 76.66% | 32.64% | 26.51% | 1.30% | 37.75% | -24.18% | 14.65% | -25.71% | 11.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between XB4A.DE and LBNK.DE is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2011 | 0.74 |
The correlation between XB4A.DE and LBNK.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XB4A.DE vs. LBNK.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XB4A.DE
LBNK.DE
XB4A.DE vs. LBNK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE) and Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LBNK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XB4A.DE | LBNK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.41 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.71 | 3.59 | +1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.75 | 12.36 | +3.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XB4A.DE vs. LBNK.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XB4A.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.54%, smaller than the maximum LBNK.DE drawdown of -78.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XB4A.DE and LBNK.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XB4A.DE | LBNK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.54% | -78.45% | +24.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.88% | -15.83% | +4.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.26% | -20.27% | +4.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.50% | -27.83% | -4.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.54% | -56.09% | +2.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | 0.00% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.86% | -47.90% | +38.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 4.61% | -1.35% |
Volatility
XB4A.DE vs. LBNK.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE) is 5.01%, while Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LBNK.DE) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that XB4A.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LBNK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XB4A.DE | LBNK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 6.19% | -1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.95% | 18.91% | -3.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.87% | 22.34% | -4.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.15% | 22.84% | -3.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 24.21% | -4.04% |
XB4A.DE vs. LBNK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XB4A.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than LBNK.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
XB4A.DE vs. LBNK.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XB4A.DE nor LBNK.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XB4A.DE and LBNK.DE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XB4A.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XB4A.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LBNK.DE.
XB4A.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while LBNK.DE is Financials Equities. XB4A.DE tracks ATX Index, while LBNK.DE tracks STOXX Europe 600 Banks Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XB4A.DE and 0.30% for LBNK.DE.
Find the right allocation for XB4A.DE and LBNK.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer