LBNK.DE vs. QDVH.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LBNK.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVH.DE).
LBNK.DE and QDVH.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LBNK.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the STOXX® Europe 600 Banks. It was launched on Aug 25, 2006. QDVH.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials. It was launched on Nov 20, 2015. Both LBNK.DE and QDVH.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
LBNK.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LBNK.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBNK.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc | -3.17% | 76.66% | 32.67% | 26.48% | 1.30% | 37.71% | -24.17% | 14.90% | -25.93% | 11.91% |
QDVH.DE iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | -8.53% | 3.01% | 37.13% | 8.44% | -6.23% | 48.50% | -12.20% | 35.41% | -10.71% | 7.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LBNK.DE achieves a -3.17% return, which is significantly higher than QDVH.DE's -8.53% return. Over the past 10 years, LBNK.DE has outperformed QDVH.DE with an annualized return of 13.59%, while QDVH.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 11.98% annualized return.
LBNK.DE
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- -3.17%
- 6M
- 11.42%
- 1Y
- 36.34%
- 3Y*
- 39.53%
- 5Y*
- 27.39%
- 10Y*
- 13.59%
QDVH.DE
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- -8.53%
- 6M
- -4.97%
- 1Y
- -5.86%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 9.56%
- 10Y*
- 11.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LBNK.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LBNK.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVH.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LBNK.DE vs. QDVH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LBNK.DE
QDVH.DE
LBNK.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LBNK.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LBNK.DE | QDVH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.46 | -0.30 | +1.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.91 | -0.28 | +2.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.96 | +0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | -0.01 | +2.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.32 | -0.02 | +10.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LBNK.DE | QDVH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | -0.30 | +1.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.19 | 0.52 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.57 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.46 | -0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between LBNK.DE and QDVH.DE is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LBNK.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LBNK.DE nor QDVH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
LBNK.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LBNK.DE drawdown since its inception was -81.84%, which is greater than QDVH.DE's maximum drawdown of -42.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBNK.DE and QDVH.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LBNK.DE | QDVH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.84% | -42.39% | -39.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.83% | -12.76% | -3.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.82% | -21.72% | -6.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.08% | -42.39% | -13.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.53% | -13.55% | +3.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.66% | -7.85% | -45.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 4.76% | -0.44% |
Volatility
LBNK.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LBNK.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.23% compared to iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVH.DE) at 4.34%. This indicates that LBNK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LBNK.DE | QDVH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.23% | 4.34% | +4.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.42% | 10.75% | +5.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.71% | 19.63% | +5.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.66% | 18.32% | +4.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.45% | 20.99% | +4.46% |