XB4A.DE vs. CG1G.DE
XB4A.DE (Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc)) and CG1G.DE (Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - XB4A.DE tracks the ATX Index while CG1G.DE tracks the DAX Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XB4A.DE returned 14.71%/yr vs 8.99%/yr for CG1G.DE. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XB4A.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CG1G.DE.
Performance
XB4A.DE vs. CG1G.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XB4A.DE achieves a 24.81% return, which is significantly higher than CG1G.DE's 1.56% return. Over the past 10 years, XB4A.DE has outperformed CG1G.DE with an annualized return of 14.71%, while CG1G.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.99% annualized return.
XB4A.DE
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 22.10%
- YTD
- 24.81%
- 1Y
- 48.60%
- 3Y*
- 31.52%
- 5Y*
- 18.18%
- 10Y*
- 14.71%
CG1G.DE
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- 6M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- 3.43%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 9.40%
- 10Y*
- 8.99%
XB4A.DE vs. CG1G.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XB4A.DE Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) | 24.81% | 51.29% | 11.01% | 14.27% | -16.45% | 42.39% | -10.86% | 19.79% | -17.99% | 32.88% |
CG1G.DE Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (Acc) | 1.56% | 22.68% | 18.23% | 19.47% | -12.77% | 15.19% | 3.12% | 24.73% | -18.14% | 12.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between XB4A.DE and CG1G.DE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2011 | 0.70 |
The correlation between XB4A.DE and CG1G.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XB4A.DE vs. CG1G.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XB4A.DE
CG1G.DE
XB4A.DE vs. CG1G.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE) and Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (Acc) (CG1G.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XB4A.DE | CG1G.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.05 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.44 | 0.28 | +4.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.07 | 0.87 | +14.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XB4A.DE vs. CG1G.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XB4A.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.54%, which is greater than CG1G.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XB4A.DE and CG1G.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XB4A.DE | CG1G.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.54% | -38.41% | -15.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.88% | -12.34% | +1.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.26% | -15.88% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.50% | -26.68% | -5.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.54% | -38.41% | -15.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -3.17% | +1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.88% | -7.18% | -2.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 3.93% | -0.71% |
Volatility
XB4A.DE vs. CG1G.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (Acc) (CG1G.DE) at 4.60%. This indicates that XB4A.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CG1G.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XB4A.DE | CG1G.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.22% | 4.60% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.88% | 13.63% | +1.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.61% | 16.38% | +1.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.15% | 17.23% | +1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 18.02% | +2.13% |
XB4A.DE vs. CG1G.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XB4A.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CG1G.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XB4A.DE vs. CG1G.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XB4A.DE nor CG1G.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XB4A.DE and CG1G.DE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CG1G.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CG1G.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XB4A.DE.
XB4A.DE tracks ATX Index, while CG1G.DE tracks DAX Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XB4A.DE and 0.10% for CG1G.DE.
Find the right allocation for XB4A.DE and CG1G.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer