DBXS.DE vs. AMED.DE
DBXS.DE (Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist)) and AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds - DBXS.DE tracks the Solactive Swiss Large Cap Index while AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBXS.DE returned 8.88%/yr vs 11.22%/yr for AMED.DE. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBXS.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMED.DE.
Performance
DBXS.DE vs. AMED.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBXS.DE achieves a 11.71% return, which is significantly lower than AMED.DE's 21.48% return.
DBXS.DE
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 9.25%
- 6M
- 11.50%
- YTD
- 11.71%
- 1Y
- 24.84%
- 3Y*
- 12.39%
- 5Y*
- 8.88%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- 6M
- 20.74%
- YTD
- 21.48%
- 1Y
- 32.17%
- 3Y*
- 16.74%
- 5Y*
- 11.22%
- 10Y*
- —
DBXS.DE vs. AMED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBXS.DE Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist) | 11.71% | 19.12% | 3.77% | 10.63% | -11.87% | 28.73% | 1.61% | 35.45% | -4.24% | -0.54% |
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 21.48% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | -1.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBXS.DE and AMED.DE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2017 | 0.51 |
The correlation between DBXS.DE and AMED.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBXS.DE vs. AMED.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBXS.DE
AMED.DE
DBXS.DE vs. AMED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist) (DBXS.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBXS.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.39 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 3.03 | -0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.07 | 11.69 | -4.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBXS.DE vs. AMED.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBXS.DE drawdown since its inception was -48.29%, which is greater than AMED.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBXS.DE and AMED.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBXS.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.29% | -38.35% | -9.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.05% | -10.56% | -1.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.48% | -14.07% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.19% | -24.06% | +6.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.74% | -5.59% | -3.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 2.75% | +0.76% |
Volatility
DBXS.DE vs. AMED.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist) (DBXS.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) at 3.37%. This indicates that DBXS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBXS.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 3.37% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.85% | 12.92% | -2.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.80% | 15.17% | -1.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.38% | 15.88% | -2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.99% | 17.35% | -3.36% |
DBXS.DE vs. AMED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBXS.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than AMED.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBXS.DE vs. AMED.DE - Dividend Comparison
DBXS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, while AMED.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DBXS.DE Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist) | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 3.25% | 1.20% | 1.59% | 1.21% | 2.35% | 1.32% | 1.06% | 1.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBXS.DE and AMED.DE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMED.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMED.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for DBXS.DE.
DBXS.DE tracks Solactive Swiss Large Cap Index, while AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for DBXS.DE and 0.25% for AMED.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBXS.DE and AMED.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer