PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAR vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XAR vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XAR having a 12.43% return and VEA slightly lower at 12.02%. Over the past 10 years, XAR has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 17.82%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.14% annualized return.


XAR

1D
-0.54%
1M
2.15%
YTD
12.43%
6M
16.39%
1Y
37.23%
3Y*
32.47%
5Y*
15.97%
10Y*
17.82%

VEA

1D
1.00%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
12.02%
6M
14.95%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
10.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAR vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XAR
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF
12.43%46.15%23.32%23.79%-5.02%2.31%6.18%39.33%-4.58%33.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
12.02%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between XAR and VEA is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2011

0.61

The correlation between XAR and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

XAR vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XAR
VEA

Industrials

99.1%
19.2%

Technology

0.8%
13.8%

Basic Materials

-

7.5%

Communication Services

-

3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.6%

Energy

-

5.4%

Financial Services

-

23.3%

Healthcare

-

8.2%

Real Estate

-

2.7%

Utilities

-

3.3%

Industrials

XAR
99.1%
VEA
19.2%

Technology

XAR
0.8%
VEA
13.8%

Basic Materials

XAR

-

VEA
7.5%

Communication Services

XAR

-

VEA
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XAR

-

VEA
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

XAR

-

VEA
5.6%

Energy

XAR

-

VEA
5.4%

Financial Services

XAR

-

VEA
23.3%

Healthcare

XAR

-

VEA
8.2%

Real Estate

XAR

-

VEA
2.7%

Utilities

XAR

-

VEA
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XAR vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAR
XAR Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAR Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
XAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAR Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAR vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XARVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.32

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

2.42

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.13

9.39

-3.25

XAR vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAR and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XARVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.75

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.55

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.59

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.24

+0.60

Drawdowns

XAR vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XARVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.37%

-60.68%

+14.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.22%

-11.63%

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.73%

-13.45%

-6.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.40%

-29.71%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.37%

-35.73%

-10.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.35%

-3.40%

-3.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-13.29%

+6.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.09%

3.00%

+3.09%

Volatility

XAR vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a higher volatility of 9.09% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) at 6.03%. This indicates that XAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XARVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.09%

6.03%

+3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.58%

13.91%

+8.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.05%

16.15%

+10.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.46%

16.63%

+6.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.65%

17.40%

+7.25%

XAR vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

XAR vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than VEA's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.69%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%
XAR
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.32%0.40%0.66%0.54%0.50%0.83%0.63%0.75%1.19%0.76%1.09%2.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


XAR and VEA have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XAR has higher volatility (9.09%) compared to VEA (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, XAR leads with 17.82% vs 10.14% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 6.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XAR has performed better with a 17.82% return vs 10.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XAR.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.32% for XAR.

XAR is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAR and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAR and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer