XAR vs. QDTE
XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) and QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XAR is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while QDTE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. XAR is passively managed, while QDTE is actively managed. Over the past year, XAR returned 37.23% vs 34.41% for QDTE. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XAR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for QDTE.
Performance
XAR vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XAR having a 12.43% return and QDTE slightly higher at 12.44%.
XAR
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- YTD
- 12.43%
- 6M
- 16.39%
- 1Y
- 37.23%
- 3Y*
- 32.47%
- 5Y*
- 15.97%
- 10Y*
- 17.82%
QDTE
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 12.44%
- 6M
- 11.71%
- 1Y
- 34.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XAR vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 12.43% | 46.15% | 17.71% |
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 12.44% | 19.32% | 16.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAR and QDTE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024 | 0.52 |
The correlation between XAR and QDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
XAR vs. QDTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XAR
QDTE
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
XAR
QDTE
-
Technology
XAR
QDTE
-
Basic Materials
XAR
-
QDTE
-
Communication Services
XAR
-
QDTE
-
Consumer Cyclical
XAR
-
QDTE
-
Consumer Defensive
XAR
-
QDTE
-
Energy
XAR
-
QDTE
-
Financial Services
XAR
-
QDTE
Healthcare
XAR
-
QDTE
-
Real Estate
XAR
-
QDTE
-
Utilities
XAR
-
QDTE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAR vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank
XAR
QDTE
XAR vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XAR | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.39 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | 3.39 | -1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.13 | 13.52 | -7.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XAR | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 2.20 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 1.17 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
XAR vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, which is greater than QDTE's maximum drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and QDTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAR | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.37% | -22.86% | -23.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.22% | -10.20% | -7.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.35% | -3.70% | -3.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -3.14% | -3.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.09% | 2.55% | +3.54% |
Volatility
XAR vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a higher volatility of 9.09% compared to Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) at 6.57%. This indicates that XAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAR | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.09% | 6.57% | +2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.58% | 12.26% | +10.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.05% | 15.71% | +11.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.46% | 18.72% | +4.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.65% | 18.72% | +5.93% |
XAR vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XAR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
XAR vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison
XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than QDTE's 44.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 44.14% | 49.49% | 32.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.32% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAR and QDTE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XAR has higher volatility (9.09%) compared to QDTE (6.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs QDTE's -22.86%.
On 1-year performance, XAR leads with 37.23% vs 34.41% for QDTE. On fees, XAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, QDTE has been the lower-risk option at 6.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XAR has performed better with a 37.23% return vs 34.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for QDTE.
QDTE has the higher dividend yield at 44.14%, compared with 0.32% for XAR.
XAR is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while QDTE is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAR and 0.97% for QDTE.
QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XAR and QDTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer