XAR vs. PHO
XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) and PHO (Invesco Water Resources ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XAR is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while PHO is a Water Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XAR returned 18.45%/yr vs 11.71%/yr for PHO. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XAR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PHO.
Performance
XAR vs. PHO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 16.10% return, which is significantly higher than PHO's -4.97% return. Over the past 10 years, XAR has outperformed PHO with an annualized return of 18.45%, while PHO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.71% annualized return.
XAR
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- YTD
- 16.10%
- 6M
- 18.39%
- 1Y
- 42.07%
- 3Y*
- 33.32%
- 5Y*
- 16.58%
- 10Y*
- 18.45%
PHO
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- -4.97%
- 6M
- -6.44%
- 1Y
- -1.80%
- 3Y*
- 7.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.17%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
XAR vs. PHO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 16.10% | 46.15% | 23.32% | 23.79% | -5.02% | 2.31% | 6.18% | 39.33% | -4.58% | 33.00% |
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | -4.97% | 7.62% | 8.59% | 18.85% | -14.86% | 31.28% | 20.83% | 37.57% | -6.40% | 23.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAR and PHO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011 | 0.67 |
The correlation between XAR and PHO shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.68 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XAR vs. PHO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XAR
PHO
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
XAR
PHO
Technology
XAR
PHO
Basic Materials
XAR
-
PHO
Communication Services
XAR
-
PHO
-
Consumer Cyclical
XAR
-
PHO
-
Consumer Defensive
XAR
-
PHO
-
Energy
XAR
-
PHO
-
Financial Services
XAR
-
PHO
Healthcare
XAR
-
PHO
Real Estate
XAR
-
PHO
-
Utilities
XAR
-
PHO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAR vs. PHO — Risk / Return Rank
XAR
PHO
XAR vs. PHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XAR | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.98 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | -0.23 | +2.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | -0.58 | +7.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XAR vs. PHO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, smaller than the maximum PHO drawdown of -55.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and PHO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAR | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.37% | -55.62% | +9.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.22% | -13.78% | -3.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.73% | -19.19% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.40% | -28.60% | -3.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.37% | -34.92% | -11.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.32% | -10.21% | +5.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -10.18% | +3.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.13% | 5.59% | +0.54% |
Volatility
XAR vs. PHO - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a higher volatility of 11.46% compared to Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) at 4.41%. This indicates that XAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAR | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.46% | 4.41% | +7.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.56% | 11.15% | +12.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.85% | 15.12% | +12.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.66% | 18.40% | +5.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.74% | 19.46% | +5.28% |
XAR vs. PHO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XAR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PHO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XAR vs. PHO - Dividend Comparison
XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than PHO's 0.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | 0.58% | 0.54% | 0.45% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.34% | 0.47% | 0.75% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAR and PHO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XAR has higher volatility (11.46%) compared to PHO (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs PHO's -55.62%.
On 10-year performance, XAR leads with 18.45% vs 11.71% for PHO. On fees, XAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PHO has been the lower-risk option at 4.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XAR has performed better with a 18.45% return vs 11.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PHO.
PHO has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.31% for XAR.
XAR is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while PHO is Water Equities. XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while PHO tracks NASDAQ OMX US Water Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAR and 0.60% for PHO.
XAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XAR and PHO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer