XAR vs. IMMR
XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) is Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while IMMR (Immersion Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XAR returned 17.12%/yr vs -0.41%/yr for IMMR. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XAR vs. IMMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly higher than IMMR's -2.12% return. Over the past 10 years, XAR has outperformed IMMR with an annualized return of 17.12%, while IMMR has yielded a comparatively lower -0.41% annualized return.
XAR
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -8.77%
- 6M
- -11.36%
- YTD
- 7.56%
- 1Y
- 17.02%
- 3Y*
- 29.13%
- 5Y*
- 15.72%
- 10Y*
- 17.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.23%
IMMR
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- -2.64%
- 6M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- -2.12%
- 1Y
- -14.13%
- 3Y*
- 1.05%
- 5Y*
- -1.45%
- 10Y*
- -0.41%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.17%
XAR vs. IMMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 7.56% | 46.15% | 23.32% | 23.79% | -5.02% | 2.31% | 6.18% | 39.33% | -4.58% | 33.00% |
IMMR Immersion Corporation | -2.12% | -18.30% | 26.47% | 3.43% | 23.12% | -49.42% | 51.95% | -17.08% | 26.91% | -33.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAR and IMMR is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAR vs. IMMR — Risk / Return Rank
XAR
IMMR
XAR vs. IMMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Immersion Corporation (IMMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XAR | IMMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.97 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | -0.56 | +1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.66 | -1.22 | +3.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XAR vs. IMMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, smaller than the maximum IMMR drawdown of -98.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and IMMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAR | IMMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.37% | -98.66% | +52.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.22% | -25.48% | +8.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.73% | -56.90% | +37.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.29% | -56.90% | +28.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.37% | -74.29% | +27.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.36% | -89.91% | +78.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -88.21% | +81.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.45% | 15.11% | -8.66% |
Volatility
XAR vs. IMMR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) is 6.93%, while Immersion Corporation (IMMR) has a volatility of 11.39%. This indicates that XAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAR | IMMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.93% | 11.39% | -4.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.61% | 27.95% | -5.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.29% | 40.69% | -12.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.70% | 45.82% | -22.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.78% | 50.93% | -26.15% |
Dividends
XAR vs. IMMR - Dividend Comparison
XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than IMMR's 4.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMMR Immersion Corporation | 4.90% | 5.59% | 2.06% | 3.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAR and IMMR have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMMR has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to XAR (6.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs IMMR's -98.66%.
XAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XAR and IMMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer