PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAR vs. IMMR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XAR vs. IMMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Immersion Corporation (IMMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly higher than IMMR's -2.12% return. Over the past 10 years, XAR has outperformed IMMR with an annualized return of 17.12%, while IMMR has yielded a comparatively lower -0.41% annualized return.


XAR

1D
0.29%
1M
-8.77%
6M
-11.36%
YTD
7.56%
1Y
17.02%
3Y*
29.13%
5Y*
15.72%
10Y*
17.12%
ALL TIME*
18.23%

IMMR

1D
-2.06%
1M
-2.64%
6M
1.39%
YTD
-2.12%
1Y
-14.13%
3Y*
1.05%
5Y*
-1.45%
10Y*
-0.41%
ALL TIME*
-3.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAR vs. IMMR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XAR
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF
7.56%46.15%23.32%23.79%-5.02%2.31%6.18%39.33%-4.58%33.00%
IMMR
Immersion Corporation
-2.12%-18.30%26.47%3.43%23.12%-49.42%51.95%-17.08%26.91%-33.58%

Correlation

The correlation between XAR and IMMR is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XAR vs. IMMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAR
XAR Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
XAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAR Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
XAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAR Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

IMMR
IMMR Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
IMMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMMR Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
IMMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMMR Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAR vs. IMMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Immersion Corporation (IMMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XARIMMRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

0.97

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

-0.56

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.66

-1.22

+3.88

XAR vs. IMMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAR Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is higher than the IMMR Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAR and IMMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XAR vs. IMMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, smaller than the maximum IMMR drawdown of -98.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and IMMR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XARIMMRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.37%

-98.66%

+52.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.22%

-25.48%

+8.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.73%

-56.90%

+37.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.29%

-56.90%

+28.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.37%

-74.29%

+27.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.36%

-89.91%

+78.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-88.21%

+81.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.45%

15.11%

-8.66%

Volatility

XAR vs. IMMR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) is 6.93%, while Immersion Corporation (IMMR) has a volatility of 11.39%. This indicates that XAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XARIMMRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.93%

11.39%

-4.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.61%

27.95%

-5.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.29%

40.69%

-12.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.70%

45.82%

-22.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.78%

50.93%

-26.15%

Dividends

XAR vs. IMMR - Dividend Comparison

XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than IMMR's 4.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMMR
Immersion Corporation
4.90%5.59%2.06%3.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XAR
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.31%0.40%0.66%0.54%0.50%0.83%0.63%0.75%1.19%0.76%1.09%2.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


XAR and IMMR have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMMR has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to XAR (6.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs IMMR's -98.66%.

XAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAR and IMMR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer