XAR vs. FLCH

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) and FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XAR is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while FLCH is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XAR returned 15.72%/yr vs -4.30%/yr for FLCH. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XAR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLCH.

Performance

XAR vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -9.29% return.

XAR

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -8.77%
• 6M: -11.36%
• YTD: 7.56%
• 1Y: 17.02%
• 3Y*: 29.13%
• 5Y*: 15.72%
• 10Y*: 17.12%
• ALL TIME*: 18.23%

FLCH

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: 1.65%
• 6M: -12.52%
• YTD: -9.29%
• 1Y: -3.28%
• 3Y*: 9.28%
• 5Y*: -4.30%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 0.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAR vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF	7.56%	46.15%	23.32%	23.79%	-5.02%	2.31%	6.18%	39.33%	-4.58%	2.28%
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	-9.29%	32.55%	18.00%	-11.21%	-22.74%	-20.87%	30.09%	24.32%	-19.52%	1.51%

Correlation

The correlation between XAR and FLCH is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.35

XAR vs. FLCH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XAR	FLCH
Industrials	98.4%	10.5%
Technology	1.6%	12.8%
Basic Materials	-	5.0%
Communication Services	-	15.4%
Consumer Cyclical	-	21.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.2%
Energy	-	3.3%
Financial Services	-	18.2%
Healthcare	-	6.0%
Real Estate	-	1.6%
Utilities	-	1.8%

Return for Risk

XAR vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAR

XAR Risk / Return Rank: 25
XAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
XAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
XAR Omega Ratio Rank: 22
XAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
XAR Martin Ratio Rank: 27

FLCH

FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 8
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 8
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAR vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XAR	FLCH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.61	-0.17	+0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.06	-0.10	+1.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	0.99	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.99	-0.15	+1.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.66	-0.34	+2.99

XAR vs. FLCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAR Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is higher than the FLCH Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAR and FLCH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XAR vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, smaller than the maximum FLCH drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and FLCH.

Drawdown Indicators

	XAR	FLCH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.37%	-62.09%	+15.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.22%	-21.48%	+4.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.73%	-25.43%	+5.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.29%	-52.45%	+24.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.36%	-36.06%	+24.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.78%	-30.61%	+23.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.45%	9.77%	-3.32%

Volatility

XAR vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a higher volatility of 6.93% compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) at 6.16%. This indicates that XAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XAR	FLCH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.93%	6.16%	+0.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.61%	14.05%	+8.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.29%	19.88%	+8.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.70%	29.62%	-5.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.78%	27.82%	-3.04%

XAR vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

XAR vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison

XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than FLCH's 2.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	2.39%	2.36%	2.87%	3.47%	2.69%	1.48%	0.91%	1.98%	1.92%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF	0.31%	0.40%	0.66%	0.54%	0.50%	0.83%	0.63%	0.75%	1.19%	0.76%	1.09%	2.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XAR and FLCH in my portfolio?

XAR and FLCH have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XAR or FLCH?

XAR has higher volatility (6.93%) compared to FLCH (6.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs FLCH's -62.09%.

Which ETF is better, XAR or FLCH?

On 5-year performance, XAR leads with 15.72% vs -4.30% for FLCH. On fees, FLCH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLCH has been the lower-risk option at 6.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XAR or FLCH?

Over the 5-year period, XAR has performed better with a 15.72% return vs -4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XAR or FLCH?

FLCH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XAR or FLCH?

FLCH has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 0.31% for XAR.

What is the main difference between XAR and FLCH?

XAR is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while FLCH is China Equities. XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAR and 0.19% for FLCH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.