XAIX vs. SCHG
XAIX (Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XAIX is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Index, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XAIX returned 54.71% vs 20.82% for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XAIX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
XAIX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XAIX achieves a 30.20% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 3.75% return.
XAIX
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- 5.11%
- YTD
- 30.20%
- 6M
- 30.19%
- 1Y
- 54.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 2.93%
- 1Y
- 20.82%
- 3Y*
- 24.03%
- 5Y*
- 14.90%
- 10Y*
- 18.53%
XAIX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XAIX Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF | 30.20% | 29.05% | 15.47% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 3.75% | 17.50% | 16.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAIX and SCHG is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2024 | 0.89 |
The correlation between XAIX and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
XAIX vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XAIX
SCHG
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
XAIX
SCHG
Communication Services
XAIX
SCHG
Consumer Cyclical
XAIX
SCHG
Financial Services
XAIX
SCHG
Industrials
XAIX
SCHG
Consumer Defensive
XAIX
SCHG
Healthcare
XAIX
SCHG
Basic Materials
XAIX
SCHG
Energy
XAIX
SCHG
Utilities
XAIX
SCHG
Real Estate
XAIX
-
SCHG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAIX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
XAIX
SCHG
XAIX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XAIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.24 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.92 | 1.27 | +2.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.14 | 4.25 | +9.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XAIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | 1.33 | +1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.81 | 0.83 | +0.98 |
Drawdowns
XAIX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAIX drawdown since its inception was -23.95%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAIX and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.95% | -34.59% | +10.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.01% | -16.41% | +2.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.33% | -4.25% | -4.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -5.20% | +1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 4.91% | -1.03% |
Volatility
XAIX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) has a higher volatility of 12.81% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 4.52%. This indicates that XAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.81% | 4.52% | +8.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.45% | 12.02% | +7.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.47% | 15.77% | +6.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.10% | 22.31% | +1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.10% | 21.58% | +2.52% |
XAIX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XAIX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
XAIX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
XAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, more than SCHG's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
XAIX Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF | 0.41% | 0.54% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAIX and SCHG have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XAIX has higher volatility (12.81%) compared to SCHG (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAIX dropped -23.95% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
On 1-year performance, XAIX leads with 54.71% vs 20.82% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XAIX has performed better with a 54.71% return vs 20.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XAIX.
XAIX has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.37% for SCHG.
XAIX is categorized as Technology Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. XAIX tracks Nasdaq Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAIX and 0.04% for SCHG.
XAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XAIX and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer