PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXNAX vs. FUAMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXNAX vs. FUAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX) and Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXNAX achieves a -0.63% return, which is significantly higher than FUAMX's -1.10% return.


FXNAX

1D
0.10%
1M
-1.25%
6M
-0.85%
YTD
-0.63%
1Y
1.77%
3Y*
3.69%
5Y*
-0.49%
10Y*
1.25%
ALL TIME*
1.96%

FUAMX

1D
0.10%
1M
-1.03%
6M
-0.99%
YTD
-1.10%
1Y
0.87%
3Y*
3.28%
5Y*
-0.99%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FXNAX vs. FUAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXNAX
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund
-0.63%7.14%1.35%5.82%-13.55%-2.10%7.63%8.50%0.04%0.38%
FUAMX
Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund
-1.10%8.00%0.40%4.07%-13.06%-3.19%8.86%7.25%1.25%-0.35%

Correlation

The correlation between FXNAX and FUAMX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017

0.94

The correlation between FXNAX and FUAMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXNAX vs. FUAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FXNAX
FXNAX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FXNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FXNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

FUAMX
FUAMX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FUAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
FUAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FXNAX vs. FUAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX) and Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXNAXFUAMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.10

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

0.62

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.55

1.43

+1.12

FXNAX vs. FUAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXNAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is higher than the FUAMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXNAX and FUAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXNAX vs. FUAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXNAX drawdown since its inception was -19.51%, roughly equal to the maximum FUAMX drawdown of -20.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXNAX and FUAMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXNAXFUAMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.51%

-20.25%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.94%

-3.72%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.11%

-5.83%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.54%

-18.27%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.89%

-7.47%

+3.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.86%

-7.31%

+3.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

1.62%

-0.45%

Volatility

FXNAX vs. FUAMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX) and Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUAMX) have volatilities of 0.99% and 1.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXNAXFUAMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

1.04%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.02%

3.30%

-0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.85%

4.22%

-0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.07%

6.63%

-0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.01%

5.82%

-0.81%

FXNAX vs. FUAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXNAX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FUAMX's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FXNAX vs. FUAMX - Dividend Comparison

FXNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, less than FUAMX's 3.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUAMX
Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund
3.53%3.52%3.58%2.19%1.24%1.76%2.90%2.16%2.23%0.49%0.00%0.00%
FXNAX
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund
3.46%3.58%3.40%3.15%1.81%1.74%2.92%2.68%2.74%2.57%2.76%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FXNAX and FUAMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FUAMX has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to FXNAX (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXNAX dropped -19.51% vs FUAMX's -20.25%.

FXNAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXNAX and FUAMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer