WXET vs. UCO

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

WXET (Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF) and UCO (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil) are both exchange-traded funds - WXET is a Leveraged Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium, while UCO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (200%). WXET is actively managed, while UCO is passively managed. Over the past year, WXET returned 23.15% vs 69.63% for UCO. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

WXET vs. UCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WXET achieves a 57.38% return, which is significantly lower than UCO's 112.22% return.

WXET

• 1D: 2.85%
• 1M: 20.33%
• 6M: 50.41%
• YTD: 57.38%
• 1Y: 23.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UCO

• 1D: 4.73%
• 1M: 12.14%
• 6M: 100.39%
• YTD: 112.22%
• 1Y: 69.63%
• 3Y*: 15.38%
• 5Y*: 16.65%
• 10Y*: 22.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WXET vs. UCO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
WXET Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF	57.38%	-37.99%	-0.40%
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil	112.22%	-29.75%	3.85%

Correlation

The correlation between WXET and UCO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024	0.18

Return for Risk

WXET vs. UCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WXET

WXET Risk / Return Rank: 21
WXET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
WXET Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
WXET Omega Ratio Rank: 22
WXET Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
WXET Martin Ratio Rank: 19

UCO

UCO Risk / Return Rank: 39
UCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
UCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
UCO Omega Ratio Rank: 39
UCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
UCO Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WXET vs. UCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WXET	UCO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.46	1.20	-0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.07	1.76	-0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.22	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.76	1.82	-1.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.38	3.83	-2.45

WXET vs. UCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WXET Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the UCO Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WXET and UCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WXET vs. UCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WXET drawdown since its inception was -48.31%, smaller than the maximum UCO drawdown of -99.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WXET and UCO.

Drawdown Indicators

	WXET	UCO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.31%	-99.86%	+51.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.76%	-38.55%	+7.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-50.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-67.24%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-96.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.64%	-83.53%	+64.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.71%	-82.12%	+51.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.78%	18.22%	-1.44%

Volatility

WXET vs. UCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF (WXET) is 18.20%, while ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) has a volatility of 19.48%. This indicates that WXET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WXET	UCO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.20%	19.48%	-1.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.68%	50.04%	-7.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.12%	58.37%	-8.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.09%	60.44%	-11.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.09%	317.63%	-268.54%

WXET vs. UCO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WXET and UCO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

WXET vs. UCO - Dividend Comparison

WXET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, while UCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WXET Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF	1.53%	3.57%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WXET and UCO in my portfolio?

WXET and UCO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WXET or UCO?

UCO has higher volatility (19.48%) compared to WXET (18.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WXET dropped -48.31% vs UCO's -99.86%.

Which ETF is better, WXET or UCO?

On 1-year performance, UCO leads with 69.63% vs 23.15% for WXET. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, WXET has been the lower-risk option at 18.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WXET or UCO?

Over the 1-year period, UCO has performed better with a 69.63% return vs 23.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WXET or UCO?

WXET and UCO have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WXET or UCO?

WXET has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.00% for UCO.

What is the main difference between WXET and UCO?

WXET is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while UCO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and ProShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.