WWJD vs. KEMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Inspire International ESG ETF (WWJD) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX).
WWJD and KEMX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WWJD is a passively managed fund by Inspire that tracks the performance of the Inspire Global Hope Ex-US Index. It was launched on Sep 30, 2019. KEMX is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. It was launched on Apr 12, 2019. Both WWJD and KEMX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
WWJD vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WWJD vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WWJD Inspire International ESG ETF | 2.49% | 29.28% | 1.05% | 16.42% | -14.60% | 16.60% | 12.91% | 11.34% |
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 9.35% | 38.28% | 0.36% | 20.57% | -19.35% | 10.55% | 12.84% | 12.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WWJD achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 9.35% return.
WWJD
- 1D
- 3.26%
- 1M
- -6.62%
- YTD
- 2.49%
- 6M
- 6.87%
- 1Y
- 24.67%
- 3Y*
- 13.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- —
KEMX
- 1D
- 4.34%
- 1M
- -11.07%
- YTD
- 9.35%
- 6M
- 21.09%
- 1Y
- 50.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.05%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WWJD vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WWJD has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WWJD vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank
WWJD
KEMX
WWJD vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire International ESG ETF (WWJD) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WWJD | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.44 | 2.36 | -0.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.06 | 3.00 | -0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.44 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 3.25 | -1.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.74 | 13.60 | -4.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WWJD | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 2.36 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.52 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.50 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between WWJD and KEMX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WWJD vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison
WWJD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than KEMX's 3.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WWJD Inspire International ESG ETF | 2.31% | 2.58% | 2.99% | 2.56% | 2.09% | 15.22% | 1.22% | 0.00% |
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 3.00% | 3.28% | 3.39% | 2.00% | 4.10% | 4.79% | 1.69% | 2.77% |
Drawdowns
WWJD vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WWJD drawdown since its inception was -35.76%, smaller than the maximum KEMX drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WWJD and KEMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WWJD | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.76% | -38.80% | +3.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.37% | -15.36% | +3.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.51% | -30.85% | +1.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.97% | -11.68% | +4.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.09% | -9.02% | +1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 3.67% | -0.90% |
Volatility
WWJD vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Inspire International ESG ETF (WWJD) is 7.63%, while KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a volatility of 12.58%. This indicates that WWJD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WWJD | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.63% | 12.58% | -4.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.46% | 16.96% | -6.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.21% | 21.39% | -4.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.61% | 17.55% | -0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.18% | 20.61% | -0.43% |