PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WWJD vs. IDOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WWJD vs. IDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire International ESG ETF (WWJD) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WWJD achieves a 7.15% return, which is significantly lower than IDOG's 14.02% return.


WWJD

1D
-1.35%
1M
0.28%
YTD
7.15%
6M
9.72%
1Y
19.41%
3Y*
14.98%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*

IDOG

1D
-0.47%
1M
3.24%
YTD
14.02%
6M
16.64%
1Y
35.52%
3Y*
21.96%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*
10.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WWJD vs. IDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WWJD
Inspire International ESG ETF
7.15%29.28%1.05%16.42%-14.60%16.60%12.91%11.34%
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
14.02%39.94%1.35%23.57%-4.50%11.33%-1.78%8.77%

Correlation

The correlation between WWJD and IDOG is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019

0.87

The correlation between WWJD and IDOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

WWJD vs. IDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WWJD
IDOG

Industrials

20.1%
11.7%

Financial Services

18.1%
11.0%

Basic Materials

13.8%
10.0%

Utilities

10.2%
10.0%

Energy

7.6%
10.7%

Technology

7.2%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
9.5%

Healthcare

5.6%
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
9.4%

Real Estate

3.1%

-

Communication Services

2.0%
9.9%

Industrials

WWJD
20.1%
IDOG
11.7%

Financial Services

WWJD
18.1%
IDOG
11.0%

Basic Materials

WWJD
13.8%
IDOG
10.0%

Utilities

WWJD
10.2%
IDOG
10.0%

Energy

WWJD
7.6%
IDOG
10.7%

Technology

WWJD
7.2%
IDOG
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

WWJD
6.9%
IDOG
9.5%

Healthcare

WWJD
5.6%
IDOG
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

WWJD
5.4%
IDOG
9.4%

Real Estate

WWJD
3.1%
IDOG

-

Communication Services

WWJD
2.0%
IDOG
9.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WWJD vs. IDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WWJD
WWJD Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
WWJD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WWJD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
WWJD Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
WWJD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
WWJD Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

IDOG
IDOG Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WWJD vs. IDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire International ESG ETF (WWJD) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WWJDIDOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.46

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

5.51

-3.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.02

19.31

-12.29

WWJD vs. IDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WWJD Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the IDOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WWJD and IDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WWJDIDOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

2.68

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.86

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.51

+0.05

Drawdowns

WWJD vs. IDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WWJD drawdown since its inception was -35.76%, roughly equal to the maximum IDOG drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WWJD and IDOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WWJDIDOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.76%

-37.32%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.77%

-6.47%

-4.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.97%

-13.92%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.51%

-25.31%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.93%

-0.47%

-2.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-7.93%

+0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

1.84%

+0.93%

Volatility

WWJD vs. IDOG - Volatility Comparison

Inspire International ESG ETF (WWJD) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) at 4.13%. This indicates that WWJD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WWJDIDOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

4.13%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.48%

10.09%

+1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.67%

13.33%

+0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.66%

15.61%

+1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.08%

17.45%

+2.63%

WWJD vs. IDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

WWJD has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than IDOG's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

WWJD vs. IDOG - Dividend Comparison

WWJD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than IDOG's 3.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
3.42%4.26%4.90%4.86%4.46%3.85%3.00%5.41%4.50%3.33%4.01%4.19%
WWJD
Inspire International ESG ETF
2.21%2.58%2.99%2.56%2.09%15.22%1.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WWJD and IDOG have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WWJD has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to IDOG (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WWJD dropped -35.76% vs IDOG's -37.32%.

On 5-year performance, IDOG leads with 13.36% vs 6.59% for WWJD. On fees, IDOG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IDOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IDOG has performed better with a 13.36% return vs 6.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDOG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for WWJD.

IDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 2.21% for WWJD.

WWJD tracks Inspire Global Hope Ex-US Index, while IDOG tracks S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for WWJD and 0.50% for IDOG.

IDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WWJD and IDOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer