PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WUGI vs. XLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WUGI vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Esoterica NextG Economy ETF (WUGI) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WUGI achieves a 28.46% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's 7.57% return.


WUGI

1D
0.29%
1M
17.60%
YTD
28.46%
6M
28.35%
1Y
48.48%
3Y*
37.24%
5Y*
17.63%
10Y*

XLG

1D
-1.15%
1M
4.22%
YTD
7.57%
6M
7.32%
1Y
28.54%
3Y*
24.46%
5Y*
16.24%
10Y*
17.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WUGI vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
WUGI
Esoterica NextG Economy ETF
28.46%22.66%47.14%61.30%-49.55%25.18%95.37%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
7.57%19.51%33.49%38.16%-24.29%30.77%47.38%

Correlation

The correlation between WUGI and XLG is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2020

0.82

The correlation between WUGI and XLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

WUGI vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WUGI
XLG

Technology

70.5%
43.9%

Communication Services

12.1%
17.1%

Industrials

9.3%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
11.3%

Financial Services

1.8%
9.6%

Healthcare

0.2%
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

0.1%
5.8%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

0.0%
0.6%

Energy

0.0%
2.7%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

WUGI
70.5%
XLG
43.9%

Communication Services

WUGI
12.1%
XLG
17.1%

Industrials

WUGI
9.3%
XLG
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

WUGI
6.3%
XLG
11.3%

Financial Services

WUGI
1.8%
XLG
9.6%

Healthcare

WUGI
0.2%
XLG
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

WUGI
0.1%
XLG
5.8%

Real Estate

WUGI
0.1%
XLG

-

Basic Materials

WUGI
0.0%
XLG
0.6%

Energy

WUGI
0.0%
XLG
2.7%

Utilities

WUGI

-

XLG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WUGI vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WUGI
WUGI Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
WUGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WUGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
WUGI Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
WUGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
WUGI Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

XLG
XLG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WUGI vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Esoterica NextG Economy ETF (WUGI) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WUGIXLGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.38

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

2.31

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.93

8.66

+0.27

WUGI vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WUGI Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WUGI and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WUGIXLGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.15

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.87

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.62

+0.29

Drawdowns

WUGI vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WUGI drawdown since its inception was -56.41%, which is greater than XLG's maximum drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WUGI and XLG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WUGIXLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.41%

-52.39%

-4.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.99%

-12.41%

-5.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.49%

-20.70%

-6.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.41%

-28.02%

-28.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.44%

+1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.67%

-7.64%

-9.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.45%

3.30%

+2.15%

Volatility

WUGI vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

Esoterica NextG Economy ETF (WUGI) has a higher volatility of 9.13% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 3.19%. This indicates that WUGI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WUGIXLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.13%

3.19%

+5.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.54%

9.80%

+9.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.20%

13.33%

+9.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.76%

18.68%

+12.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.89%

18.84%

+12.05%

WUGI vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

WUGI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

WUGI vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

WUGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.77%, more than XLG's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WUGI
Esoterica NextG Economy ETF
17.77%22.83%4.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
0.60%0.64%0.72%0.97%1.34%0.94%1.25%1.58%2.00%1.85%2.00%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


WUGI and XLG have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WUGI has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to XLG (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WUGI dropped -56.41% vs XLG's -52.39%.

On 5-year performance, WUGI leads with 17.63% vs 16.24% for XLG. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, WUGI has performed better with a 17.63% return vs 16.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for WUGI.

WUGI has the higher dividend yield at 17.77%, compared with 0.60% for XLG.

WUGI is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while XLG is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Esoterica and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for WUGI and 0.20% for XLG.

XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WUGI and XLG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer