PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTV vs. SCHV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTV vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTV achieves a 11.47% return, which is significantly lower than SCHV's 15.97% return.


WTV

1D
0.86%
1M
4.50%
YTD
11.47%
6M
12.37%
1Y
25.21%
3Y*
22.93%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*

SCHV

1D
0.50%
1M
5.01%
YTD
15.97%
6M
16.54%
1Y
29.76%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*
11.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTV vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WTV
WisdomTree US Value ETF
11.47%13.51%23.99%22.35%-8.06%30.59%6.15%29.69%-8.29%1.14%
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
15.97%16.02%14.13%8.93%-7.65%25.58%2.64%25.92%-7.30%0.34%

Correlation

The correlation between WTV and SCHV is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2017

0.90

The correlation between WTV and SCHV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

WTV vs. SCHV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WTV
SCHV

Financial Services

19.5%
19.6%

Technology

15.3%
18.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
6.9%

Consumer Defensive

10.7%
8.8%

Industrials

10.5%
14.0%

Healthcare

7.3%
11.3%

Communication Services

6.9%
2.5%

Energy

6.8%
7.2%

Real Estate

5.3%
4.1%

Utilities

4.8%
4.6%

Basic Materials

2.2%
2.8%

Financial Services

WTV
19.5%
SCHV
19.6%

Technology

WTV
15.3%
SCHV
18.2%

Consumer Cyclical

WTV
10.7%
SCHV
6.9%

Consumer Defensive

WTV
10.7%
SCHV
8.8%

Industrials

WTV
10.5%
SCHV
14.0%

Healthcare

WTV
7.3%
SCHV
11.3%

Communication Services

WTV
6.9%
SCHV
2.5%

Energy

WTV
6.8%
SCHV
7.2%

Real Estate

WTV
5.3%
SCHV
4.1%

Utilities

WTV
4.8%
SCHV
4.6%

Basic Materials

WTV
2.2%
SCHV
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTV vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTV
WTV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
WTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTV Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
WTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHV
SCHV Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SCHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTV vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WTVSCHVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.50

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

4.38

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.55

17.71

-6.16

WTV vs. SCHV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTV Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the SCHV Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTV and SCHV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WTVSCHVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.82

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.73

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.72

-0.04

Drawdowns

WTV vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTV drawdown since its inception was -42.18%, which is greater than SCHV's maximum drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTV and SCHV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTVSCHVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.18%

-37.08%

-5.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.15%

-6.83%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.49%

-15.26%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.30%

-19.78%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

0.00%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-3.83%

-1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

1.68%

+0.51%

Volatility

WTV vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) have volatilities of 3.01% and 2.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTVSCHVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

2.97%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.92%

8.14%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.82%

10.63%

+1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.09%

14.51%

+2.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.20%

16.93%

+3.27%

WTV vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

WTV vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison

WTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than SCHV's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
1.75%2.02%2.25%2.42%2.37%1.93%3.03%3.02%3.05%2.37%2.65%2.69%
WTV
WisdomTree US Value ETF
1.64%1.59%1.54%1.62%2.08%1.55%1.63%1.44%1.94%0.41%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTV and SCHV have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WTV has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to SCHV (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTV dropped -42.18% vs SCHV's -37.08%.

On 5-year performance, WTV leads with 13.36% vs 10.51% for SCHV. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, WTV has performed better with a 13.36% return vs 10.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for WTV.

SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.64% for WTV.

WTV tracks WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Value Index, while SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for WTV and 0.04% for SCHV.

SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTV and SCHV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer