WTV vs. OMFL
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL).
WTV and OMFL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WTV is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Value Index. It was launched on Feb 23, 2007. OMFL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 OFI Dynamic Multifactor Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2017. Both WTV and OMFL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WTV or OMFL.
Key characteristics
| WTV | OMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 29.00% | 8.83% |
| 1Y Return | 44.73% | 22.20% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 13.41% | 4.47% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 15.81% | 13.06% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.49 | 1.68 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.83 | 2.30 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.63 | 1.29 |
| Calmar Ratio | 6.77 | 1.81 |
| Martin Ratio | 20.47 | 5.35 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.29% | 4.51% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.36% | 14.35% |
| Max Drawdown | -61.95% | -33.24% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTV and OMFL is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
WTV vs. OMFL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, WTV achieves a 29.00% return, which is significantly higher than OMFL's 8.83% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WTV vs. OMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than OMFL's 0.29% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WTV vs. OMFL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WTV vs. OMFL - Dividend Comparison
WTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than OMFL's 1.27% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTV WisdomTree US Value ETF | 1.51% | 1.62% | 2.08% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.44% | 1.94% | 1.38% | 1.30% | 1.57% | 1.20% | 1.17% |
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 1.27% | 1.37% | 1.55% | 0.95% | 1.48% | 1.53% | 1.39% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
WTV vs. OMFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTV drawdown since its inception was -61.95%, which is greater than OMFL's maximum drawdown of -33.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTV and OMFL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WTV vs. OMFL - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) at 3.92%. This indicates that WTV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.