WTV vs. QGRW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WTV (WisdomTree US Value ETF) and QGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - WTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Value Index, while QGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WTV returned 22.93%/yr vs 29.12%/yr for QGRW. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WTV charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QGRW.

Performance

WTV vs. QGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTV achieves a 11.47% return, which is significantly lower than QGRW's 15.43% return.

WTV

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 4.50%
• YTD: 11.47%
• 6M: 12.37%
• 1Y: 25.21%
• 3Y*: 22.93%
• 5Y*: 13.36%
• 10Y*: —

QGRW

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 8.02%
• YTD: 15.43%
• 6M: 14.33%
• 1Y: 35.04%
• 3Y*: 29.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTV vs. QGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
WTV WisdomTree US Value ETF	11.47%	13.51%	23.99%	22.35%	-0.60%
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	15.43%	19.20%	34.85%	56.05%	-3.30%

Correlation

The correlation between WTV and QGRW is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2022	0.56

The correlation between WTV and QGRW shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WTV vs. QGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WTV	QGRW
Financial Services	19.5%	4.1%
Technology	15.3%	52.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	12.4%
Consumer Defensive	10.7%	0.5%
Industrials	10.5%	8.0%
Healthcare	7.3%	4.3%
Communication Services	6.9%	17.8%
Energy	6.8%	0.6%
Real Estate	5.3%	-
Utilities	4.8%	0.4%
Basic Materials	2.2%	-

Return for Risk

WTV vs. QGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTV

WTV Risk / Return Rank: 67
WTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
WTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
WTV Omega Ratio Rank: 64
WTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
WTV Martin Ratio Rank: 64

QGRW

QGRW Risk / Return Rank: 55
QGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
QGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
QGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 58
QGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
QGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTV vs. QGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WTV	QGRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	2.02	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	2.71	+0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.35	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.54	2.28	+1.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.55	8.92	+2.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WTV vs. QGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTV Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the QGRW Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTV and QGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WTV	QGRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.15	2.02	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	1.65	-0.98

Drawdowns

WTV vs. QGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTV drawdown since its inception was -42.18%, which is greater than QGRW's maximum drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTV and QGRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	WTV	QGRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.18%	-24.40%	-17.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.15%	-15.44%	+8.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.49%	-24.40%	+5.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-1.33%	+1.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.05%	-3.26%	-1.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.19%	3.94%	-1.75%

Volatility

WTV vs. QGRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV) is 3.01%, while WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that WTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WTV	QGRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.01%	4.69%	-1.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.92%	13.67%	-5.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.82%	17.39%	-5.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.09%	21.07%	-3.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.20%	21.07%	-0.87%

WTV vs. QGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than QGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

WTV vs. QGRW - Dividend Comparison

WTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than QGRW's 0.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	0.07%	0.09%	0.14%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WTV WisdomTree US Value ETF	1.64%	1.59%	1.54%	1.62%	2.08%	1.55%	1.63%	1.44%	1.94%	0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WTV and QGRW in my portfolio?

WTV and QGRW have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WTV or QGRW?

QGRW has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to WTV (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTV dropped -42.18% vs QGRW's -24.40%.

Which ETF is better, WTV or QGRW?

On 3-year performance, QGRW leads with 29.12% vs 22.93% for WTV. On fees, WTV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, WTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WTV or QGRW?

Over the 3-year period, QGRW has performed better with a 29.12% return vs 22.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WTV or QGRW?

WTV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QGRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WTV or QGRW?

WTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.07% for QGRW.

What is the main difference between WTV and QGRW?

WTV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while QGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. WTV tracks WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Value Index, while QGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for WTV and 0.28% for QGRW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.