WTV vs. AUSF

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

WTV (WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund) and AUSF (Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. WTV is actively managed, while AUSF is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WTV returned 13.53%/yr vs 13.33%/yr for AUSF. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WTV charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for AUSF.

Performance

WTV vs. AUSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTV achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly higher than AUSF's 5.74% return.

WTV

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -0.07%
• YTD: 9.70%
• 6M: 8.81%
• 1Y: 23.03%
• 3Y*: 21.15%
• 5Y*: 13.53%
• 10Y*: —

AUSF

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: -2.24%
• YTD: 5.74%
• 6M: 4.91%
• 1Y: 14.20%
• 3Y*: 19.47%
• 5Y*: 13.33%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTV vs. AUSF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
WTV WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund	9.70%	13.51%	23.99%	22.35%	-8.06%	30.59%	6.15%	29.69%	-14.47%
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	5.74%	13.69%	16.05%	22.26%	-0.18%	27.48%	1.27%	24.06%	-11.18%

Correlation

The correlation between WTV and AUSF is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2018	0.88

The correlation between WTV and AUSF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

WTV vs. AUSF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WTV	AUSF
Financial Services	18.5%	18.4%
Technology	18.3%	15.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	9.3%
Industrials	10.3%	14.4%
Consumer Defensive	9.9%	7.8%
Healthcare	7.5%	11.4%
Communication Services	6.5%	8.6%
Energy	6.4%	3.2%
Real Estate	5.4%	4.6%
Utilities	4.5%	4.4%
Basic Materials	2.2%	2.6%

Return for Risk

WTV vs. AUSF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTV

WTV Risk / Return Rank: 62
WTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
WTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
WTV Omega Ratio Rank: 58
WTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
WTV Martin Ratio Rank: 61

AUSF

AUSF Risk / Return Rank: 42
AUSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
AUSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
AUSF Omega Ratio Rank: 37
AUSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
AUSF Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTV vs. AUSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WTV	AUSF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	1.39	+0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.83	2.01	+0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.24	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.24	2.44	+0.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.49	6.97	+3.52

WTV vs. AUSF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTV Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the AUSF Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTV and AUSF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WTV vs. AUSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTV drawdown since its inception was -42.18%, roughly equal to the maximum AUSF drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTV and AUSF.

Drawdown Indicators

	WTV	AUSF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.18%	-44.25%	+2.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.15%	-5.84%	-1.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.49%	-12.29%	-6.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.30%	-14.23%	-5.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.87%	-3.24%	+1.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.03%	-4.20%	-0.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.20%	2.04%	+0.16%

Volatility

WTV vs. AUSF - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV) has a higher volatility of 3.64% compared to Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) at 2.91%. This indicates that WTV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WTV	AUSF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.64%	2.91%	+0.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.20%	6.91%	+1.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.92%	10.27%	+1.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.08%	13.62%	+3.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.17%	19.03%	+1.14%

WTV vs. AUSF - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than AUSF's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

WTV vs. AUSF - Dividend Comparison

WTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than AUSF's 2.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	2.78%	2.78%	2.63%	1.83%	2.51%	2.22%	2.95%	4.02%	1.46%	0.00%
WTV WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund	1.66%	1.59%	1.54%	1.62%	2.08%	1.55%	1.63%	1.44%	1.94%	0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WTV and AUSF in my portfolio?

WTV and AUSF have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WTV or AUSF?

WTV has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to AUSF (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTV dropped -42.18% vs AUSF's -44.25%.

Which ETF is better, WTV or AUSF?

On 5-year performance, WTV leads with 13.53% vs 13.33% for AUSF. On fees, WTV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, AUSF has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WTV or AUSF?

Over the 5-year period, WTV has performed better with a 13.53% return vs 13.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WTV or AUSF?

WTV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for AUSF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WTV or AUSF?

AUSF has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 1.66% for WTV.

What is the main difference between WTV and AUSF?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for WTV and 0.27% for AUSF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.