WTV vs. AUSF

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

WTV (WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund) and AUSF (Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. WTV is actively managed, while AUSF is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WTV returned 13.92%/yr vs 14.47%/yr for AUSF. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. WTV charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for AUSF.

Performance

WTV vs. AUSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTV achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly higher than AUSF's 12.60% return.

WTV

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 2.29%
• 6M: 10.70%
• YTD: 14.35%
• 1Y: 25.32%
• 3Y*: 19.48%
• 5Y*: 13.92%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.73%

AUSF

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 3.29%
• 6M: 7.58%
• YTD: 12.60%
• 1Y: 20.12%
• 3Y*: 19.13%
• 5Y*: 14.47%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	$2.36M	$2.26M	$3.95M
WTV WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund	$14.67M	$17.66M	$16.09M

WTV vs. AUSF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
WTV WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund	14.35%	13.51%	23.99%	22.35%	-8.06%	30.59%	6.15%	29.69%	-14.47%
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	12.60%	13.69%	16.05%	22.26%	-0.18%	27.48%	1.27%	24.06%	-11.18%

Correlation

The correlation between WTV and AUSF is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2018	0.88

The correlation between WTV and AUSF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

WTV vs. AUSF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WTV	AUSF
Financial Services	22.3%	20.1%
Technology	17.8%	15.7%
Consumer Defensive	9.5%	7.9%
Industrials	9.4%	13.4%
Healthcare	9.1%	12.3%
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	8.8%
Communication Services	6.8%	6.6%
Energy	6.0%	3.3%
Real Estate	5.2%	4.3%
Utilities	4.7%	4.5%
Basic Materials	1.0%	2.5%

Return for Risk

WTV vs. AUSF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WTV

WTV Risk / Return Rank: 85
WTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
WTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
WTV Omega Ratio Rank: 84
WTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
WTV Martin Ratio Rank: 83

AUSF

AUSF Risk / Return Rank: 80
AUSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
AUSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
AUSF Omega Ratio Rank: 77
AUSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
AUSF Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WTV vs. AUSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WTV	AUSF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	1.83	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.94	2.68	+0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.32	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.31	3.27	+0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.99	9.56	+1.42

WTV vs. AUSF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTV Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the AUSF Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTV and AUSF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WTV vs. AUSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTV drawdown since its inception was -42.18%, roughly equal to the maximum AUSF drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTV and AUSF.

Drawdown Indicators

	WTV	AUSF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.18%	-44.25%	+2.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.15%	-5.84%	-1.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.49%	-12.29%	-6.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.30%	-14.23%	-5.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.60%	-1.62%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.97%	-4.16%	-0.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.15%	1.99%	+0.16%

Volatility

WTV vs. AUSF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV) is 3.16%, while Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) has a volatility of 3.73%. This indicates that WTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WTV	AUSF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.16%	3.73%	-0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.05%	7.46%	+0.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.73%	10.46%	+1.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.02%	13.62%	+3.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.07%	18.96%	+1.11%

WTV vs. AUSF - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than AUSF's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

WTV vs. AUSF - Dividend Comparison

WTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than AUSF's 2.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	2.61%	2.78%	2.63%	1.83%	2.51%	2.22%	2.95%	4.02%	1.46%	0.00%
WTV WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund	1.86%	1.59%	1.54%	1.62%	2.08%	1.55%	1.63%	1.44%	1.94%	0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WTV and AUSF in my portfolio?

WTV and AUSF have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WTV or AUSF?

AUSF has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to WTV (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTV dropped -42.18% vs AUSF's -44.25%.

Which ETF is better, WTV or AUSF?

On 5-year performance, AUSF leads with 14.47% vs 13.92% for WTV. On fees, WTV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, WTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WTV or AUSF?

Over the 5-year period, AUSF has performed better with a 14.47% return vs 13.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WTV or AUSF?

WTV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for AUSF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WTV or AUSF?

AUSF has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.86% for WTV.

What is the main difference between WTV and AUSF?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for WTV and 0.27% for AUSF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.