WTIU vs. SPUU
WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) and SPUU (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - WTIU tracks the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%) while SPUU tracks the S&P 500 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WTIU returned 5.93%/yr vs 38.21%/yr for SPUU. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WTIU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for SPUU.
Performance
WTIU vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTIU achieves a 91.57% return, which is significantly higher than SPUU's 19.82% return.
WTIU
- 1D
- 4.02%
- 1M
- -7.74%
- YTD
- 91.57%
- 6M
- 66.33%
- 1Y
- 103.25%
- 3Y*
- 5.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPUU
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 10.01%
- YTD
- 19.82%
- 6M
- 19.11%
- 1Y
- 53.61%
- 3Y*
- 38.21%
- 5Y*
- 20.19%
- 10Y*
- 24.77%
WTIU vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 91.57% | -17.13% | -29.63% | -28.42% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares | 19.82% | 26.55% | 44.25% | 27.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTIU and SPUU is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2023 | 0.19 |
The correlation between WTIU and SPUU shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WTIU vs. SPUU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WTIU
SPUU
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
WTIU
SPUU
Basic Materials
WTIU
-
SPUU
Communication Services
WTIU
-
SPUU
Consumer Cyclical
WTIU
-
SPUU
Consumer Defensive
WTIU
-
SPUU
Financial Services
WTIU
-
SPUU
Healthcare
WTIU
-
SPUU
Industrials
WTIU
-
SPUU
Real Estate
WTIU
-
SPUU
Technology
WTIU
-
SPUU
Utilities
WTIU
-
SPUU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTIU vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank
WTIU
SPUU
WTIU vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTIU | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.38 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 2.96 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.55 | 13.06 | -6.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTIU | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 2.26 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 0.63 | -0.73 |
Drawdowns
WTIU vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTIU drawdown since its inception was -75.73%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIU and SPUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTIU | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.73% | -59.35% | -16.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.11% | -18.19% | -20.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.73% | -35.18% | -40.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.10% | -1.27% | -30.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.19% | -9.51% | -29.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.83% | 4.12% | +11.71% |
Volatility
WTIU vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) has a higher volatility of 27.06% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU) at 5.71%. This indicates that WTIU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTIU | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.06% | 5.71% | +21.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.98% | 18.09% | +36.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.51% | 23.90% | +43.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.62% | 33.46% | +37.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.62% | 35.77% | +34.85% |
WTIU vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTIU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTIU vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison
WTIU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares | 1.34% | 1.63% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 0.88% | 3.04% | 8.03% | 1.80% | 5.50% | 6.96% | 8.08% | 4.42% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WTIU and SPUU have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WTIU has higher volatility (27.06%) compared to SPUU (5.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTIU dropped -75.73% vs SPUU's -59.35%.
On 3-year performance, SPUU leads with 38.21% vs 5.93% for WTIU. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 5.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 38.21% return vs 5.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPUU is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WTIU.
SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.00% for WTIU.
WTIU tracks Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%), while SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: REX and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WTIU and 0.64% for SPUU.
SPUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WTIU and SPUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer