WTIU vs. QTJL

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. WTIU is passively managed, while QTJL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, WTIU returned -1.81%/yr vs 19.04%/yr for QTJL. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WTIU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.

Performance

WTIU vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTIU achieves a 43.70% return, which is significantly higher than QTJL's 7.41% return.

WTIU

• 1D: 2.10%
• 1M: -18.32%
• YTD: 43.70%
• 6M: 46.65%
• 1Y: 45.61%
• 3Y*: -1.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTJL

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 7.41%
• 6M: 6.99%
• 1Y: 18.39%
• 3Y*: 19.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTIU vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN	43.70%	-17.13%	-29.63%	-28.45%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	7.41%	21.07%	16.50%	23.33%

Correlation

The correlation between WTIU and QTJL is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2023	0.09

The correlation between WTIU and QTJL shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WTIU vs. QTJL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WTIU	QTJL
Energy	100.0%	0.5%
Basic Materials	-	1.0%
Communication Services	-	14.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.6%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	3.7%
Industrials	-	2.6%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	58.0%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

WTIU vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTIU

WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 22
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 23
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 22

QTJL

QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 71
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 75
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTIU vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WTIU	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.67	1.87	-1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.25	2.68	-1.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.39	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.97	2.76	-1.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.51	14.56	-12.05

WTIU vs. QTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTIU Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the QTJL Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTIU and QTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WTIU vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTIU drawdown since its inception was -75.73%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIU and QTJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	WTIU	QTJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.73%	-33.40%	-42.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.07%	-6.68%	-40.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-75.73%	-22.43%	-53.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.06%	-0.01%	-49.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.21%	-7.84%	-31.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.25%	1.27%	+16.98%

Volatility

WTIU vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) has a higher volatility of 22.57% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 0.59%. This indicates that WTIU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WTIU	QTJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.57%	0.59%	+21.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.28%	7.37%	+48.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.30%	9.86%	+58.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.77%	20.29%	+50.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.77%	20.29%	+50.48%

WTIU vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTIU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

WTIU vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither WTIU nor QTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WTIU and QTJL in my portfolio?

WTIU and QTJL have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WTIU or QTJL?

WTIU has higher volatility (22.57%) compared to QTJL (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTIU dropped -75.73% vs QTJL's -33.40%.

Which ETF is better, WTIU or QTJL?

On 3-year performance, QTJL leads with 19.04% vs -1.81% for WTIU. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WTIU or QTJL?

Over the 3-year period, QTJL has performed better with a 19.04% return vs -1.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WTIU or QTJL?

QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WTIU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WTIU or QTJL?

WTIU and QTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between WTIU and QTJL?

They also come from different issuers: REX and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WTIU and 0.79% for QTJL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.