WTIU vs. QID
Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID).
WTIU and QID are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WTIU is a passively managed fund by REX that tracks the performance of the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). It was launched on Feb 16, 2023. QID is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (-200%). It was launched on Jul 11, 2006. Both WTIU and QID are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
WTIU vs. QID - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WTIU vs. QID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 113.23% | -17.13% | -29.63% | -28.42% |
QID ProShares UltraShort QQQ | 10.13% | -34.97% | -34.06% | -41.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTIU achieves a 113.23% return, which is significantly higher than QID's 10.13% return.
WTIU
- 1D
- -11.84%
- 1M
- 17.12%
- YTD
- 113.23%
- 6M
- 89.84%
- 1Y
- 46.84%
- 3Y*
- 2.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QID
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- 7.52%
- YTD
- 10.13%
- 6M
- 6.26%
- 1Y
- -38.21%
- 3Y*
- -33.24%
- 5Y*
- -26.91%
- 10Y*
- -35.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WTIU vs. QID - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both WTIU and QID have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
WTIU vs. QID — Risk / Return Rank
WTIU
QID
WTIU vs. QID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTIU | QID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.58 | -0.85 | +1.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | -1.10 | +2.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.85 | +0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | -0.67 | +1.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.71 | -0.80 | +2.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTIU | QID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 | -0.85 | +1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | -0.77 | +0.72 |
Correlation
The correlation between WTIU and QID is -0.09. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
WTIU vs. QID - Dividend Comparison
WTIU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QID ProShares UltraShort QQQ | 4.71% | 6.25% | 7.99% | 5.63% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.92% | 2.54% | 1.38% | 0.08% |
Drawdowns
WTIU vs. QID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTIU drawdown since its inception was -75.73%, smaller than the maximum QID drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIU and QID.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTIU | QID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.73% | -99.98% | +24.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.11% | -58.65% | +5.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -84.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.42% | -99.98% | +75.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.49% | -86.89% | +47.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.53% | 49.18% | -20.65% |
Volatility
WTIU vs. QID - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) has a higher volatility of 22.50% compared to ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) at 13.33%. This indicates that WTIU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WTIU | QID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.50% | 13.33% | +9.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.56% | 25.59% | +20.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.69% | 45.20% | +36.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.54% | 44.78% | +24.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.54% | 44.45% | +25.09% |