QID vs. TQQQ
QID (ProShares UltraShort QQQ) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - QID tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (-200%) while TQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QID returned -37.32%/yr vs 39.46%/yr for TQQQ. Their -1.00 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
QID vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QID achieves a -21.02% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 23.06% return. Over the past 10 years, QID has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of -37.32%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 39.46% annualized return.
QID
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 6.86%
- 6M
- -19.38%
- YTD
- -21.02%
- 1Y
- -35.07%
- 3Y*
- -33.07%
- 5Y*
- -27.97%
- 10Y*
- -37.32%
- ALL TIME*
- -34.54%
TQQQ
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- -11.90%
- 6M
- 20.14%
- YTD
- 23.06%
- 1Y
- 56.87%
- 3Y*
- 43.81%
- 5Y*
- 15.36%
- 10Y*
- 39.46%
- ALL TIME*
- 42.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $255.66M | $222.38M | $304.58M | |
| $4.37B | $4.57B | $5.33B |
QID vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QID ProShares UltraShort QQQ | -21.02% | -34.97% | -34.06% | -57.19% | 66.30% | -44.93% | -69.71% | -49.57% | -9.90% | -44.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 23.06% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 82.98% | 110.05% | 133.84% | -19.79% | 118.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between QID and TQQQ is -1.00, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | -1.00 |
The correlation between QID and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
QID vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QID
TQQQ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
QID
TQQQ
Basic Materials
QID
-
TQQQ
Communication Services
QID
-
TQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
QID
-
TQQQ
Consumer Defensive
QID
-
TQQQ
Energy
QID
-
TQQQ
Healthcare
QID
-
TQQQ
Industrials
QID
-
TQQQ
Real Estate
QID
-
TQQQ
Technology
QID
-
TQQQ
Utilities
QID
-
TQQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QID vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
QID
TQQQ
QID vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QID | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.17 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | 1.29 | -2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | 3.60 | -4.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QID vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QID drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QID and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QID | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -81.66% | -18.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.65% | -36.97% | -7.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.50% | -58.04% | -21.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.72% | -81.66% | -7.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.21% | -81.66% | -17.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -25.74% | -74.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.09% | -18.49% | -68.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.20% | 13.24% | +10.96% |
Volatility
QID vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) is 13.93%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 20.41%. This indicates that QID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QID | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.93% | 20.41% | -6.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.16% | 47.79% | -15.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.79% | 57.62% | -18.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.80% | 68.04% | -22.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.96% | 66.57% | -21.61% |
QID vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QID and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
QID vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
QID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.46%, more than TQQQ's 0.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QID ProShares UltraShort QQQ | 7.46% | 6.25% | 7.99% | 5.63% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.92% | 2.54% | 1.38% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.58% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QID and TQQQ have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TQQQ has higher volatility (20.41%) compared to QID (13.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QID dropped -99.99% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.
On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 39.46% vs -37.32% for QID. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, QID has been the lower-risk option at 13.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 39.46% return vs -37.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QID and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
QID has the higher dividend yield at 7.46%, compared with 0.58% for TQQQ.
QID tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-200%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%).
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QID and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer