QID vs. SQQQ
QID (ProShares UltraShort QQQ) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - QID tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (-200%) while SQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QID returned -38.34%/yr vs -55.56%/yr for SQQQ. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
QID vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QID achieves a -28.70% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -43.51% return. Over the past 10 years, QID has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of -38.34%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -55.56% annualized return.
QID
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- 6M
- -25.87%
- YTD
- -28.70%
- 1Y
- -41.01%
- 3Y*
- -36.90%
- 5Y*
- -29.74%
- 10Y*
- -38.34%
SQQQ
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -4.14%
- 6M
- -40.16%
- YTD
- -43.51%
- 1Y
- -58.48%
- 3Y*
- -54.03%
- 5Y*
- -46.44%
- 10Y*
- -55.56%
QID vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QID ProShares UltraShort QQQ | -28.70% | -34.97% | -34.06% | -57.19% | 66.30% | -44.93% | -69.71% | -49.57% | -9.90% | -44.00% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -43.51% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between QID and SQQQ is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | 1.00 |
The correlation between QID and SQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
QID vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QID
SQQQ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
QID
SQQQ
Basic Materials
QID
-
SQQQ
-
Communication Services
QID
-
SQQQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
QID
-
SQQQ
-
Consumer Defensive
QID
-
SQQQ
-
Energy
QID
-
SQQQ
-
Healthcare
QID
-
SQQQ
-
Industrials
QID
-
SQQQ
-
Real Estate
QID
-
SQQQ
-
Technology
QID
-
SQQQ
-
Utilities
QID
-
SQQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QID vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
QID
SQQQ
QID vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QID | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 0.80 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | -0.96 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.81 | -1.78 | -0.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QID vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QID drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, roughly equal to the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QID and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QID | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -100.00% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.65% | -61.03% | +16.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.50% | -92.51% | +13.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.72% | -97.27% | +8.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.25% | -99.97% | +0.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -100.00% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.05% | -92.75% | +5.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.54% | 32.59% | -10.05% |
Volatility
QID vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) is 17.52%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 26.13%. This indicates that QID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QID | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.52% | 26.13% | -8.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.45% | 45.54% | -15.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.93% | 55.22% | -18.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.55% | 67.80% | -22.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.81% | 66.51% | -21.70% |
QID vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QID and SQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
QID vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
QID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.26%, less than SQQQ's 10.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QID ProShares UltraShort QQQ | 8.26% | 6.25% | 7.99% | 5.63% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.92% | 2.54% | 1.38% | 0.08% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 10.57% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, QID and SQQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SQQQ has higher volatility (26.13%) compared to QID (17.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QID dropped -99.99% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, QID leads with -38.34% vs -55.56% for SQQQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, QID has been the lower-risk option at 17.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QID has performed better with a -38.34% return vs -55.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QID and SQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.57%, compared with 8.26% for QID.
QID tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-200%), while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%).
SQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.06 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QID and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer