QID vs. RWM
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) and ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM).
QID and RWM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QID is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (-200%). It was launched on Jul 11, 2006. RWM is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 (-100%). It was launched on Jan 23, 2007. Both QID and RWM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QID or RWM.
Correlation
The correlation between QID and RWM is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
QID vs. RWM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
QID:
-1.05
RWM:
-0.41
QID:
-1.62
RWM:
-0.45
QID:
0.82
RWM:
0.95
QID:
-0.38
RWM:
-0.09
QID:
-1.44
RWM:
-0.91
QID:
26.17%
RWM:
9.35%
QID:
35.79%
RWM:
20.83%
QID:
-99.97%
RWM:
-94.64%
QID:
-99.97%
RWM:
-94.16%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QID achieves a -35.88% return, which is significantly lower than RWM's -6.61% return. Over the past 10 years, QID has underperformed RWM with an annualized return of -35.81%, while RWM has yielded a comparatively higher -10.18% annualized return.
QID
-35.88%
-5.64%
-14.26%
-36.24%
-40.43%
-35.81%
RWM
-6.61%
3.96%
-8.87%
-6.92%
-10.92%
-10.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QID vs. RWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QID and RWM have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QID vs. RWM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) and ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QID vs. RWM - Dividend Comparison
QID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.50%, more than RWM's 4.40% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QID ProShares UltraShort QQQ | 6.50% | 5.64% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.92% | 2.54% | 1.38% | 0.07% |
RWM ProShares Short Russell2000 | 4.40% | 4.78% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 1.55% | 0.87% | 0.07% |
Drawdowns
QID vs. RWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QID drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than RWM's maximum drawdown of -94.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QID and RWM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QID vs. RWM - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) has a higher volatility of 10.39% compared to ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) at 5.99%. This indicates that QID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.