WTID vs. METD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD).

WTID and METD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WTID is a passively managed fund by REX that tracks the performance of the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). It was launched on Feb 16, 2023. METD is an actively managed fund by Direxion. It was launched on Jun 5, 2024.

Performance

WTID vs. METD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WTID vs. METD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
WTID MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	-64.82%	-44.50%	22.19%
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	12.25%	-17.33%	-15.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTID achieves a -64.82% return, which is significantly lower than METD's 12.25% return.

WTID

• 1D: 4.88%
• 1M: -34.34%
• YTD: -64.82%
• 6M: -65.12%
• 1Y: -73.42%
• 3Y*: -48.22%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

METD

• 1D: -6.54%
• 1M: 11.62%
• YTD: 12.25%
• 6M: 23.48%
• 1Y: -7.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTID vs. METD - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTID has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than METD's 1.00% expense ratio.

METD

Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF

WTID

MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN

Return for Risk

WTID vs. METD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTID

WTID Risk / Return Rank: 1
WTID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
WTID Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
WTID Omega Ratio Rank: 1
WTID Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
WTID Martin Ratio Rank: 2

METD

METD Risk / Return Rank: 9
METD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
METD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
METD Omega Ratio Rank: 9
METD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
METD Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTID vs. METD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WTID	METD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.91	-0.20	-0.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.81	0.00	-1.81
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	1.00	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.86	-0.19	-0.67
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.33	-0.27	-1.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WTID vs. METD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTID Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is lower than the METD Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTID and METD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WTID	METD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.91	-0.20	-0.72
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.66	-0.35	-0.31

Correlation

The correlation between WTID and METD is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

WTID vs. METD - Dividend Comparison

WTID has not paid dividends to shareholders, while METD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%.

	TTM	2025	2024
WTID MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	2.43%	3.35%	2.30%

Drawdowns

WTID vs. METD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTID drawdown since its inception was -90.35%, which is greater than METD's maximum drawdown of -46.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTID and METD.

Drawdown Indicators

	WTID	METD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.35%	-46.03%	-44.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-86.07%	-39.89%	-46.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-89.63%	-27.85%	-61.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.57%	-28.04%	-24.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	56.03%	29.13%	+26.90%

Volatility

WTID vs. METD - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) has a higher volatility of 17.45% compared to Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) at 13.49%. This indicates that WTID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than METD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WTID	METD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.45%	13.49%	+3.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	44.85%	26.76%	+18.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	80.62%	40.30%	+40.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.06%	36.27%	+32.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.06%	36.27%	+32.79%