WTID vs. BMNU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WTID (MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and BMNU (T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WTID is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%), while BMNU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX. WTID is passively managed, while BMNU is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. WTID charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for BMNU.

Performance

WTID vs. BMNU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) and T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTID achieves a -62.23% return, which is significantly higher than BMNU's -75.84% return.

WTID

• 1D: -3.31%
• 1M: -1.13%
• YTD: -62.23%
• 6M: -57.99%
• 1Y: -72.92%
• 3Y*: -48.40%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BMNU

• 1D: -11.49%
• 1M: -47.97%
• YTD: -75.84%
• 6M: -85.71%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTID vs. BMNU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WTID MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	-62.23%	7.08%
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF	-75.84%	-81.57%

Correlation

The correlation between WTID and BMNU is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025	-0.08

Return for Risk

WTID vs. BMNU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTID

WTID Risk / Return Rank: 1
WTID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
WTID Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
WTID Omega Ratio Rank: 1
WTID Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
WTID Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTID vs. BMNU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) and T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WTID	BMNU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.10	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-2.24	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.77	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.94	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.55	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WTID	BMNU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.61	-0.53	-0.08

Drawdowns

WTID vs. BMNU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTID drawdown since its inception was -90.35%, smaller than the maximum BMNU drawdown of -97.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTID and BMNU.

Drawdown Indicators

	WTID	BMNU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.35%	-97.05%	+6.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-78.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-88.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-88.87%	-97.05%	+8.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-54.44%	-79.69%	+25.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	47.10%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WTID	BMNU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.63%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.59%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.54%	187.60%	-121.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.34%	187.60%	-117.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.34%	187.60%	-117.26%

WTID vs. BMNU - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTID has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BMNU's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

WTID vs. BMNU - Dividend Comparison

Neither WTID nor BMNU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WTID and BMNU in my portfolio?

WTID and BMNU have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WTID or BMNU?

On fees, WTID is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WTID or BMNU?

WTID is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for BMNU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WTID or BMNU?

WTID and BMNU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between WTID and BMNU?

WTID is categorized as Inverse Equities, while BMNU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WTID and 1.50% for BMNU.