PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTID vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WTID vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WTID vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
WTID
MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
-64.82%-44.50%-7.93%-17.12%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
83.99%-8.46%13.35%-3.43%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTID achieves a -64.82% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 83.99% return.


WTID

1D
4.88%
1M
-34.34%
YTD
-64.82%
6M
-65.12%
1Y
-73.42%
3Y*
-48.22%
5Y*
10Y*

USO

1D
-1.99%
1M
55.28%
YTD
83.99%
6M
72.54%
1Y
64.55%
3Y*
24.19%
5Y*
24.91%
10Y*
5.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WTID vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTID has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than USO's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

WTID vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTID
WTID Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
WTID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTID Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTID Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
WTID Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTID Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTID vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WTIDUSODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.91

1.65

-2.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.81

2.32

-4.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.30

-0.50

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

3.44

-4.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.33

5.96

-7.29

WTID vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTID Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is lower than the USO Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTID and USO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WTIDUSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.91

1.65

-2.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.66

-0.19

-0.47

Correlation

The correlation between WTID and USO is -0.63. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

WTID vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

Neither WTID nor USO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

WTID vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTID drawdown since its inception was -90.35%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTID and USO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WTIDUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.35%

-98.19%

+7.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-86.07%

-20.39%

-65.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.63%

-86.46%

-3.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.57%

-75.21%

+22.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

56.03%

11.77%

+44.26%

Volatility

WTID vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) is 17.45%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 21.87%. This indicates that WTID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WTIDUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.45%

21.87%

-4.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.85%

29.71%

+15.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

80.62%

39.38%

+41.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.06%

34.41%

+34.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.06%

38.33%

+30.73%