WTID vs. DOG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WTID (MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and DOG (ProShares Short Dow30) are both Inverse Equities funds - WTID tracks the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%) while DOG tracks the DJ Industrial Average (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WTID returned -48.40%/yr vs -8.28%/yr for DOG. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

WTID vs. DOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) and ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTID achieves a -62.23% return, which is significantly lower than DOG's -4.15% return.

WTID

• 1D: -3.31%
• 1M: -1.13%
• YTD: -62.23%
• 6M: -57.99%
• 1Y: -72.92%
• 3Y*: -48.40%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DOG

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: -3.36%
• YTD: -4.15%
• 6M: -4.06%
• 1Y: -12.72%
• 3Y*: -8.28%
• 5Y*: -5.31%
• 10Y*: -11.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTID vs. DOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
WTID MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	-62.23%	-44.50%	-7.93%	-17.12%
DOG ProShares Short Dow30	-4.15%	-8.40%	-5.62%	-4.76%

Correlation

The correlation between WTID and DOG is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2023	0.28

The correlation between WTID and DOG shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WTID vs. DOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WTID	DOG
Energy	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	81.2%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

WTID vs. DOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTID

WTID Risk / Return Rank: 1
WTID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
WTID Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
WTID Omega Ratio Rank: 1
WTID Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
WTID Martin Ratio Rank: 1

DOG

DOG Risk / Return Rank: 1
DOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
DOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
DOG Omega Ratio Rank: 2
DOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
DOG Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTID vs. DOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) and ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WTID	DOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.10	-1.05	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.24	-1.42	-0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.77	0.84	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.94	-0.87	-0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.55	-1.43	-0.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WTID vs. DOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTID Sharpe Ratio is -1.10, which is comparable to the DOG Sharpe Ratio of -1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTID and DOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WTID	DOG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.10	-1.05	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.61	-0.57	-0.04

Drawdowns

WTID vs. DOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTID drawdown since its inception was -90.35%, roughly equal to the maximum DOG drawdown of -92.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTID and DOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	WTID	DOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.35%	-92.69%	+2.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-78.12%	-14.63%	-63.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-88.99%	-28.77%	-60.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.99%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-70.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-88.87%	-92.61%	+3.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-54.44%	-66.39%	+11.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	47.10%	8.89%	+38.21%

Volatility

WTID vs. DOG - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) has a higher volatility of 25.63% compared to ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) at 2.98%. This indicates that WTID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WTID	DOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.63%	2.98%	+22.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.59%	9.37%	+44.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.54%	12.13%	+54.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.34%	14.79%	+55.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.34%	17.49%	+52.85%

WTID vs. DOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WTID and DOG have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

WTID vs. DOG - Dividend Comparison

WTID has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DOG ProShares Short Dow30	3.49%	3.65%	5.72%	4.54%	0.41%	0.00%	0.14%	1.54%	0.86%	0.04%
WTID MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WTID and DOG in my portfolio?

WTID and DOG have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WTID or DOG?

WTID has higher volatility (25.63%) compared to DOG (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTID dropped -90.35% vs DOG's -92.69%.

Which ETF is better, WTID or DOG?

On 3-year performance, DOG leads with -8.28% vs -48.40% for WTID. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, DOG has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WTID or DOG?

Over the 3-year period, DOG has performed better with a -8.28% return vs -48.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WTID or DOG?

WTID and DOG have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WTID or DOG?

DOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 0.00% for WTID.

What is the main difference between WTID and DOG?

WTID tracks Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%), while DOG tracks DJ Industrial Average (-100%). They also come from different issuers: REX and ProShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.05 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.