WTIBX vs. WISGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund (WTIBX) and Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX).
WTIBX is managed by Segall Bryant & Hamill. It was launched on Jun 1, 1988. WISGX is managed by Segall Bryant & Hamill. It was launched on Dec 20, 2013.
Performance
WTIBX vs. WISGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WTIBX vs. WISGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTIBX Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund | -0.28% | 7.38% | 1.99% | 7.47% | -13.13% | -0.58% | 8.49% | 8.80% | -0.17% | 4.74% |
WISGX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund | 1.94% | 6.85% | 15.75% | 18.32% | -32.48% | 11.79% | 57.84% | 28.67% | 3.03% | 26.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTIBX achieves a -0.28% return, which is significantly lower than WISGX's 1.94% return. Over the past 10 years, WTIBX has underperformed WISGX with an annualized return of 2.34%, while WISGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.10% annualized return.
WTIBX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- 4.09%
- 3Y*
- 4.24%
- 5Y*
- 0.80%
- 10Y*
- 2.34%
WISGX
- 1D
- 4.27%
- 1M
- -7.03%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 5.24%
- 1Y
- 22.43%
- 3Y*
- 11.46%
- 5Y*
- 1.46%
- 10Y*
- 13.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WTIBX vs. WISGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTIBX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than WISGX's 0.87% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WTIBX vs. WISGX — Risk / Return Rank
WTIBX
WISGX
WTIBX vs. WISGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund (WTIBX) and Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTIBX | WISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 0.94 | +0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.42 | 1.44 | -0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.19 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 1.52 | 0.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.81 | 5.85 | -1.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTIBX | WISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 0.94 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.06 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.55 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 0.44 | +0.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between WTIBX and WISGX is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
WTIBX vs. WISGX - Dividend Comparison
WTIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, while WISGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTIBX Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund | 3.82% | 4.11% | 4.04% | 3.66% | 3.23% | 3.08% | 3.95% | 3.95% | 3.55% | 3.50% | 3.43% | 3.55% |
WISGX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 29.83% | 7.74% | 0.00% | 0.09% |
Drawdowns
WTIBX vs. WISGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTIBX drawdown since its inception was -17.72%, smaller than the maximum WISGX drawdown of -43.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIBX and WISGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTIBX | WISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.72% | -43.22% | +25.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.00% | -14.26% | +11.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.72% | -43.22% | +25.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.72% | -43.22% | +25.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.27% | -8.74% | +6.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.95% | -12.69% | +10.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 3.69% | -2.75% |
Volatility
WTIBX vs. WISGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund (WTIBX) is 1.61%, while Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX) has a volatility of 9.23%. This indicates that WTIBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WISGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WTIBX | WISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 9.23% | -7.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.59% | 15.49% | -12.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.31% | 24.34% | -20.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.61% | 24.44% | -18.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.65% | 23.93% | -19.28% |