PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTIBX vs. SBASX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTIBX vs. SBASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund (WTIBX) and Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund (SBASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTIBX achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than SBASX's 20.42% return.


WTIBX

1D
0.32%
1M
0.88%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.88%
1Y
5.19%
3Y*
4.71%
5Y*
0.65%
10Y*
2.27%

SBASX

1D
2.11%
1M
7.61%
YTD
20.42%
6M
17.58%
1Y
32.53%
3Y*
15.43%
5Y*
8.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTIBX vs. SBASX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WTIBX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund
0.74%7.38%1.99%7.47%-13.13%-0.58%8.49%-0.19%
SBASX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund
20.42%3.95%11.89%13.96%-13.13%23.52%22.80%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between WTIBX and SBASX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019

0.13

Over the past year, WTIBX and SBASX have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.13, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTIBX vs. SBASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTIBX
WTIBX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
WTIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
WTIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

SBASX
SBASX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SBASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBASX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SBASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBASX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTIBX vs. SBASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund (WTIBX) and Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund (SBASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WTIBXSBASXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

2.83

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.20

10.27

-5.07

WTIBX vs. SBASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTIBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the SBASX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTIBX and SBASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WTIBX vs. SBASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTIBX drawdown since its inception was -17.72%, smaller than the maximum SBASX drawdown of -34.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIBX and SBASX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTIBXSBASXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.72%

-34.34%

+16.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.97%

-11.44%

+8.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.83%

-26.56%

+20.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.72%

-26.56%

+8.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.28%

0.00%

-1.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.95%

-8.21%

+6.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

3.14%

-2.12%

Volatility

WTIBX vs. SBASX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund (WTIBX) is 1.21%, while Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund (SBASX) has a volatility of 5.99%. This indicates that WTIBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTIBXSBASXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.21%

5.99%

-4.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.82%

13.75%

-10.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.79%

18.22%

-14.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.65%

19.88%

-14.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.67%

22.22%

-17.55%

WTIBX vs. SBASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTIBX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than SBASX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTIBX vs. SBASX - Dividend Comparison

WTIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, less than SBASX's 4.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SBASX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Core Fund
4.64%5.58%5.48%3.65%2.10%18.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WTIBX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund
4.13%4.11%4.04%3.66%3.23%3.08%3.95%3.95%3.55%3.50%3.43%3.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTIBX and SBASX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBASX has higher volatility (5.99%) compared to WTIBX (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTIBX dropped -17.72% vs SBASX's -34.34%.

SBASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTIBX and SBASX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer