WTIBX vs. DBLTX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

WTIBX (Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund) and DBLTX (DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - WTIBX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by Segall Bryant & Hamill, while DBLTX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by DoubleLine. Over the past 10 years, WTIBX returned 2.25%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for DBLTX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WTIBX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DBLTX.

Performance

WTIBX vs. DBLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund (WTIBX) and DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTIBX achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly higher than DBLTX's 0.01% return. Over the past 10 years, WTIBX has outperformed DBLTX with an annualized return of 2.25%, while DBLTX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.78% annualized return.

WTIBX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: 0.42%
• 6M: 0.45%
• 1Y: 5.88%
• 3Y*: 4.64%
• 5Y*: 0.75%
• 10Y*: 2.25%

DBLTX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -0.18%
• YTD: 0.01%
• 6M: 0.22%
• 1Y: 5.29%
• 3Y*: 4.54%
• 5Y*: 0.62%
• 10Y*: 1.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTIBX vs. DBLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WTIBX Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund	0.42%	7.38%	1.99%	7.47%	-13.13%	-0.58%	8.49%	8.80%	-0.17%	4.74%
DBLTX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I	0.01%	8.05%	3.08%	5.34%	-12.56%	0.24%	4.13%	5.81%	1.76%	3.80%

Correlation

The correlation between WTIBX and DBLTX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010	0.87

The correlation between WTIBX and DBLTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WTIBX vs. DBLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTIBX

WTIBX Risk / Return Rank: 25
WTIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
WTIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
WTIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
WTIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
WTIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

DBLTX

DBLTX Risk / Return Rank: 19
DBLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
DBLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
DBLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
DBLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
DBLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTIBX vs. DBLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund (WTIBX) and DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WTIBX	DBLTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.31	+0.13
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.15	1.95	+0.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.24	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	1.66	+0.28
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.03	5.14	+0.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WTIBX vs. DBLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTIBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the DBLTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTIBX and DBLTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WTIBX	DBLTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.44	1.31	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	0.11	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.40	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.03	0.91	+0.12

Drawdowns

WTIBX vs. DBLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTIBX drawdown since its inception was -17.72%, which is greater than DBLTX's maximum drawdown of -16.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIBX and DBLTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WTIBX	DBLTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.72%	-16.49%	-1.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.97%	-3.17%	+0.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.83%	-6.59%	+0.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.72%	-16.49%	-1.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.72%	-16.49%	-1.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.59%	-2.00%	+0.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.95%	-2.38%	+0.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.96%	1.03%	-0.07%

Volatility

WTIBX vs. DBLTX - Volatility Comparison

Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund (WTIBX) and DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX) have volatilities of 1.39% and 1.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WTIBX	DBLTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.39%	1.38%	+0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.75%	2.79%	-0.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.86%	3.87%	-0.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.64%	5.60%	+0.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.67%	4.41%	+0.26%

WTIBX vs. DBLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTIBX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than DBLTX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

WTIBX vs. DBLTX - Dividend Comparison

WTIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, less than DBLTX's 4.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBLTX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I	4.89%	4.86%	5.03%	4.35%	3.86%	3.12%	3.39%	3.66%	3.74%	3.65%	3.72%	4.11%
WTIBX Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund	4.14%	4.11%	4.04%	3.66%	3.23%	3.08%	3.95%	3.95%	3.55%	3.50%	3.43%	3.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WTIBX and DBLTX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, WTIBX and DBLTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, WTIBX or DBLTX?

WTIBX has higher volatility (1.39%) compared to DBLTX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTIBX dropped -17.72% vs DBLTX's -16.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WTIBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.